Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - coombs

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 911
1
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry family trees full of lazy errors
« on: Sunday 01 March 26 14:17 GMT (UK)  »
FindMyPast has a "other records with the same name" feature at the bottom of a transcript/scan of original image, which like Ancestry hints, has to be taken with a pinch of SAXA and checked.

Also RootsWeb will be another site which will have trees with errors. I used to upload my PAF to there 20 years ago.


2
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry family trees full of lazy errors
« on: Saturday 28 February 26 22:55 GMT (UK)  »
A relatively distant cousin was born 18 Dec 1944, and I found his birth reg in the last quarter of 1944. Before looking him up, I did take into account that his birth may appear in the first quarter of 1945 due to the 42 day time frame allowed, so I checked the first quarter of 1945 and nothing, then found him in the last quarter of 1944, so his birth was quite promptly registered, inbetween, say, 18-19 to 31 Dec 1944.

I have looked at several birth entries in the GRO indexes of relatives and extended family. 

3
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry family trees full of lazy errors
« on: Thursday 26 February 26 13:53 GMT (UK)  »
I found the birth reg of a grandparent's cousin who I know through other records was born in early January 1932, but the birth reg first appears in the births registered in the April, May, June quarter of 1932. So registered after 3 months at least.

4
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry family trees full of lazy errors
« on: Wednesday 25 February 26 16:36 GMT (UK)  »
One of mine was born 1 June 1899, registered 12 August 1899. 

5
The Common Room / Re: Ancestry family trees full of lazy errors
« on: Wednesday 25 February 26 14:44 GMT (UK)  »
I am always intrigued by the "Births registered in, January, February and March" writing at the top of the pages in the birth entries for the first quarter of the respective years, knowing how 6 weeks was at least recommended to register a birth, and wondering how many of the births took place in the last 2 months of the previous year. I would say about 30% to 40% of births registered in say, the first quarter of 1945, took place in late 1944. This probably means to buy an actual downloadable version of their birth cert through the GRO website will be available in 2045 or 2046.

A distant cousin was born on 1 Dec 1928 in London, and his birth appears in "Births registered in, January, February and March 1929". I looked at 2 of the other 5 entries on the page, and two of them were born in late and late-ish Nov 1928, so the births were likely registered in early Jan 1929. Another tree on Anc has the distant cousin as being actually born in 1929, using the quarter in which the birth was registered. I found the 1 Dec 1928 DOB for Andrew from 1939 register.

My step 3xgreat gran's death was registered in the first quarter of 1929. I got the cert from the GRO website downloadable feature and found that she died on 31 Dec 1928, and registered 2 Jan 1929. Other trees have her as dying in 1929, but probably only because they have not obtained the death cert yet. I added the correct year of death, as it was very very late 1928.

6
The Common Room / Re: I fail to see…..
« on: Sunday 22 February 26 16:07 GMT (UK)  »
There is a Fairstead in Essex and a Fairstead in Kings Lynn, Norfolk. An ancestor was born in the Essex one yet a distant cousin's tree on Ancestry has the Norfolk one as his POB, but it is an easy mistake to make, maybe they selected the Norfolk one in the drop down menu or just got mistaken. I sometimes forget which parishes an ancestor was born and have to refresh my memory.

I have another ancestor who I found owned land in the Norfolk Fairstead in the 1600s.

7
The Common Room / Re: Were both Parents at baptism?
« on: Friday 20 February 26 15:33 GMT (UK)  »
I have a great, great aunty baptised in a rural Suffolk village after her father died a few months earlier, and the baptism lists both parents, but not that the father is now deceased. Whereas I have seen some baptisms which can note "father deceased" or "mother now deceased".

If a widow/deserted wife was having children out of wedlock she may have claimed the deceased/runaway husband was the father to save face, and this will not usually be noted in the baptism. The vicar just wrote down whatever he was told, and she may have said "The dad is away at sea, or away in the army". Or the vicar may not even have questioned why one parent was not there.

99.9% of baptisms do not state if the parents were present at the baptism.

8
The Common Room / Re: Thomas Barnes, London, Lighterman
« on: Wednesday 18 February 26 12:35 GMT (UK)  »
I had a look on FindMyPast for any occupational records for Thomas Barnes born 5 years either side of 1880 and could not find anything.

9
The Common Room / Re: Thomas Barnes, London, Lighterman
« on: Monday 16 February 26 16:16 GMT (UK)  »
I think Thomas Barnes birth was registered in Stepney in the last quarter of 1880, mother's maiden name Bishop. Vol 1C, page 457. So Catherine's maiden name was Bishop.

In 1881 Catherine Barnes says she was born Pimlico, London, but in 1891 she says Oxford, Oxfordshire. I think Oxford is correct. A Catherine Emily Bishop birth was registered in Oxford in 1856, mmn Wilkes. Catherine Emily Bishop wed Robert Barnes in 1878 in Limehouse, or Mile End.

I found Catherine in the 1861 census in Stepney aged 4 born Oxford, child of Thomas and Matilda Bishop. According to 1861, she had a brother born in Paddington, and another sibling born St George East about 1858. So Catherine grew up in London.  Ironically her mother Matilda Bishop (Nee Wilkes if you go by Catherine's 1856 birth reg) was born in Bletchingdon, Oxfordshire, where some of my lot came from. Small world.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 911