1
Northumberland / Re: Adams from Scotland - 2 births
« on: Monday 25 August 08 16:38 BST (UK) »
Ok,
I throw in the towel.
I got some my information from LDS records long before SP came on line & not only have I got some dodgy information, it looks like I've got information relating to another Hugh and Agnes Adams interspersed with more recently aquired accurate info from the GROS.
In my records I have my family in Saltoun E Lothian in 1891.
1901 in Inveresk is totally weird & doesn't tally with any family reported info, but the entry is compelling.
A lot of the info I have I know is right as I have the family certificates, Hugh's war records, and even a letter from the King, and I have reported info direct from Hugh's grandchildren, so I'm trying not to be too despondant. I just need to revisit this line again when I go to the GROS next.
Thanks for the help with Isaac & John. As I said, I have no familiarity with Englsih records, so that helps confirm later info.
Gadget, some of the information is wrong. Yes, I accept that, but did you have to put it so unpleasantly? as I said, I would look at it at the weekend, as I work away, but you kinda went off on your own anyway.
Please put me on ignore from now on & I promise not to post unless I'm at home with all my records laid out in front of me. My family did rename later children after those who died in infancy & many did, so I have kept even dodgy looking info until I track down absolutely all the birth and death certs. I need to update this line with all the new info that is available since I last followd them a good few years ago.
Signing off this board now.
I throw in the towel.
I got some my information from LDS records long before SP came on line & not only have I got some dodgy information, it looks like I've got information relating to another Hugh and Agnes Adams interspersed with more recently aquired accurate info from the GROS.
In my records I have my family in Saltoun E Lothian in 1891.
1901 in Inveresk is totally weird & doesn't tally with any family reported info, but the entry is compelling.
A lot of the info I have I know is right as I have the family certificates, Hugh's war records, and even a letter from the King, and I have reported info direct from Hugh's grandchildren, so I'm trying not to be too despondant. I just need to revisit this line again when I go to the GROS next.
Thanks for the help with Isaac & John. As I said, I have no familiarity with Englsih records, so that helps confirm later info.
Gadget, some of the information is wrong. Yes, I accept that, but did you have to put it so unpleasantly? as I said, I would look at it at the weekend, as I work away, but you kinda went off on your own anyway.
Please put me on ignore from now on & I promise not to post unless I'm at home with all my records laid out in front of me. My family did rename later children after those who died in infancy & many did, so I have kept even dodgy looking info until I track down absolutely all the birth and death certs. I need to update this line with all the new info that is available since I last followd them a good few years ago.
Signing off this board now.