Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Aulus

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 163
1
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Occupation on 1861 census
« on: Thursday 29 May 25 21:05 BST (UK)  »
Long shot – Assisting mothers keeping.

Ooh. That's good.  I wonder if it could be "Assinsting in House Keeping"

Ah I see Shaun simul-posted that.

2
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Profession needed 3
« on: Thursday 29 May 25 21:04 BST (UK)  »
The top one looks like works inspector (or something like that), but I guess it's the bottom one you're asking about, as that seems utterly illegible.

Is that image from a certificate from the GRO?  I can't see the swirly General Register Office security marking under the text, but I've got some scans downloaded from trees online, where that is bleached out.  If it's not from GRO, and if it's important enough to you, then it might be worth ordering a certificate from the GRO, as the register originally submitted to them would have been different to the one in the local register office, or the one kept at the church.  Or if it's from the GRO, then it might be worth getting a copy from the local register office/archives - again, if it's important enough to you.  Actually, if it's from the GRO, then it might be worth complaining to them that it's illegible, as you may at least get some money refunded!

3
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Occupation on 1861 census
« on: Thursday 29 May 25 20:42 BST (UK)  »
Can anyone help me work out what Fanny Hinsley's occupation was (RG9/1858, p.19) in Madeley, Shropshire on the 1861 census, please?

I can now only see Asst under Keeping, which doesn't make any sense to me.

4
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Army discharge 1858
« on: Saturday 15 July 23 18:57 BST (UK)  »
Thank you both!

Amentia it is.

Not a term I'd heard before.  Must bear it mind if I'm ever on Countdown.

5
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Completed: Army discharge 1858
« on: Saturday 15 July 23 18:42 BST (UK)  »
Can anyone work out in consequence of what this says Private Timothy Holden was discharged in 1858 from the 84th Regiment of Foot?



It's clearly to do with him being unfit for service due to being (in the language used later in the document) an imbecile.  (He died in Lancaster Asylum in 1865.)

But I can't work out the underlined word Au..enti.. ? ? ?

6
Surrey / Re: Lost link to Chapel of Dulwich College baptisms
« on: Sunday 12 February 23 18:57 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks! 

I must have been looking at a different record for some barmy reason.

Unfortunately, I'm looking for an 1804 baptism*, which appears to be outside of what Ancestry hold.


* Joseph Thorback s.o. Wm & Eliz bapt 1804 Dulwich College Chapel according to the Pallots Index.

7
Surrey / Re: Lost link to Chapel of Dulwich College baptisms
« on: Sunday 12 February 23 18:42 GMT (UK)  »
Have Ancestry removed the Dulwich College baptisms from their records now?  I can't find them, even following the instructions above.

Dulwich College Chapel doesn't appear as a parish under Southwark or Lambeth boroughs for me, and searching the whole collection with just Dulwich College under keyword returns nothing.




8
Family History Programs, Tree Organisation, Presentation / Android gedcom viewer?
« on: Monday 30 January 23 17:03 GMT (UK)  »
Hello everyone,

For years, I've been using Family Bee as a simple gedcom viewer on my Android 'phones. (My main family history programme is Family Historian, and I just periodically copied the gedcom that creates to my 'phone.)

But having just upgraded to a new Android 'phone, it seems that Family Bee is no longer available. :(

I liked Family Bee as it was uncomplicated and very fast. I know I can access Ancestry/FindMyPast on my 'phone, but it's nice to have something quick and simple. Plus I also keep a bit more info, particularly on living individuals, on my offline tree.

Does anyone have a recommendation for a replacement for Family Bee?

Thanks

9
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: 1921 Census, Citing Source
« on: Sunday 30 October 22 19:21 GMT (UK)  »
Excellent. Thanks for the reply. 

That's really useful.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 163