1
England / Re: Mystery of the Grieving Patton Heiress
« on: Monday 02 June 08 21:38 BST (UK) »
I agree the 1841 census sighting of the family is all important.
But where was William Pollock Beaton in 1841? I have tried to find him without success.
As John Beaton named his first daughter after her maternal grandmother, Jean Paterson, it is very likely that he WAS an old-fashioned Scottish-naming-pattern sort of chap and that his son William was named after his father. We should therefore be looking for a William Beaton born probably not much later than 1780.
It is also important to get a COMPLETE list of John's children by Janet Paton, since the name of Janet's father ought to come fairly close to the top, and it would be helpful to have a list of John's brothers too so as to sort Beaton names from Paton ones.
But where was William Pollock Beaton in 1841? I have tried to find him without success.
As John Beaton named his first daughter after her maternal grandmother, Jean Paterson, it is very likely that he WAS an old-fashioned Scottish-naming-pattern sort of chap and that his son William was named after his father. We should therefore be looking for a William Beaton born probably not much later than 1780.
It is also important to get a COMPLETE list of John's children by Janet Paton, since the name of Janet's father ought to come fairly close to the top, and it would be helpful to have a list of John's brothers too so as to sort Beaton names from Paton ones.