7
« on: Wednesday 09 August 06 21:55 BST (UK) »
Thank you so much for your assistance. I'm amazed at how quickly you have gathered information which took me weeks to collect.
The 1881 census family you mention are indeed my great grandmother, my grandmother Winifred and her brother and sisters. Peter Hughes aged 30 did marry Alice Tyrer on November 15th, 1871 in Our Lady's Church, Blackbrook (Blackbrook Chapel, Parr in the registry office records in Prescot). The civil registration was in Prescot. Peter's father was not named and the registrar told me that this meant he was illegitimate although in the church marriage book his father was given as Thomas Hughes! This does fit in with the Joseph and Lydia Hughes family which you found in the 1841 census because Betty (Elizabeth) gave birth to a son, Peter, on July 2nd, 1841 who was baptised in Our Lady's Church, Blackbrook on July 11th, 1841. His father was given as Thomas Hughes but the Hughes had a line drawn through it and Fisher written above it in the same handwriting. The official birth certificate does not name the father. The couple had had a daughter, Mary, born October 6th, 1839, baptised October 13th, 1839. Thomas Fisher was also a sponsor to 2 infants in 1849 and 1850 in thesame church but I can't find him in any of the census returns around this time.
Joseph and Lydia also had a son called Peter who was born on July 21st, 1839 and baptised on August 4th, 1839. I've not found any other mention of him.
I think James was Peter's cousin, not his twin, because his mother was Jane Hughes and he was born on September 1st, 1841 and baptised on September 12th, 1841 at Our Lady's, Blackbrook.
I was confident that Elizabeth Hughes' son Peter must be the Peter Hughes who married Alice Tyrer despite my 94 year old relative insisting that Peter came from Mold and spoke Welsh (she also thought his mother was a Fisher). She is totally convinced she is right, as she is about Sir William Hughes, the brother. On the information I had found I had always dismissed these claims so I was stunned to receive the photograph of Sir William Hughes which had been in the family all this time and is in excellent condition. The only place I can see William fitting into the story is as another illegitimate child of Elizabeth Hughes but born elsewhere! This is why I am anxious to trace him.
Peter Hughes as a 9 year old was a scholar, unlike cousin James who was an errand boy. I have a studio photograph of him as a young adult. He owned a lovely pocket watch which he had on him in the pit explosion. The watch is still in the family and which Ian Winstanley photographed for his second book on the disaster. He owned a harmonium and sheet music which I saw as a child and yet he was a coal miner!
Another cousin of mine says that he had been told that Peter was illegitimate and his father had wanted to set him up in business as a pub landlord but he refused.
There was a Thomas Fisher born in Burtonwood and living in Widnes in 1881 who was a grocer and born in 1815. This would make him a suitable age to have been Peter's father. An aunty (now dead) told me that her mother and her aunty (Peter's daughters) sometimes visited their grandfather in Widnes when they were young but they were stopped from going there. She didn't know anything else. (I was told this long before I had started my research)
I can't find anything at all about this Thomas Fisher in earlier years so I'm not able to link the 2.
Sorry to write so much but you've been so helpful I wanted to giveyou the full story as I know it. Everything is certain back to Peter Hughes marrying Alice Tyrer but I'm still not sure I've got the right Peter Hughes before that.
Thanks again,
Cecilia