Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Retford67

Pages: [1]
1
KGarrad
thanks - I was replying to sparebot not the OP (Jerry). I believe sparebot is also using family search so hopefully they might see the mesage.

2

..........................................................................
Yes the Bradley family is huge but I think we are vaguely related. I found Amy and Louis on family search and added them to my tree, so if you look on there you should find a whole load of Bradleys!

I know Claters Close really well as I grew up with my grandparents nearby. According to Family Search, Louis is my 2nd cousin twice removed. I don't remember your family but I'm sure my grandad (who knew everything) would have known - especially if they were living so close.

Anyway, if you'd like to check out the tree on Family Search you'll find I've gone back quite a way. John Bradley 1829 is our common ancester.

John Bradley
1829–Deceased
Married to (22.04.1851)
Ann Nettleship
Female
1834–1918

They had (at least) 10 children. You are descended from William and I am descended from George. There is another lady on this forum who is descended from Thomas.

Anyway, to go back a generation:

John Bradley
1786–Deceased

Married 13 December 1810

Mary Antcliff
1791–Deceased

They had 9 children.

Elijah Bradley
1813–Deceased

George Bradley
1812–Deceased

John Bradley
1817–1824

William Bradley
1817–Deceased

Ann Bradley
1822–Deceased

Mary Bradley
1824–Deceased

Martha Bradley
1827–Deceased

John Bradley
1829–Deceased

Job Bradley
1832–Deceased

I haven't got any further on the Bradley line, but on the Nettleship line there are loads...

So Ann Nettleship descends from:

Thomas Nettleship 1808-1877
Mary Taylor 1809-1874

Ann had 6 siblings that I've found.

Thomas 1808 descends from Thomas Nettleship 1777 and Sarah Nettleship 1781
Mary Taylor descends from John Taylor 1773-1850 and Sarah Meades 1766-1849

That's as far back as I can get at the moment. If you want Ann's siblings as well then please look at the family tree on family search.

My name on family search is Teresa9223 and if you send me a request I'll happily link to you so you can see the tree.

Best wishes

3
Nottinghamshire / Re: Bradley / Duncanson - Brick Wall
« on: Tuesday 23 September 25 17:51 BST (UK)  »
Hi I have this man also in my family tree (not a direct relative). He is my 2nd great grand uncle - I am descended from one of his brothers. This brother was also a very bad man (my grandad always told me he hated his grandad). My whole branch of the family emigrated to Canada and then came back again to Retford. There were about 30+ of them who went to Canada but I can't find Thomas and Florence on the list.

Anyway, Thomas's parents were John Bradley (b 1829 in Eaton) and Sarah Nettleship (1834-1918 in Upton).

They had the following children:


George Bradley
1852–1930

Emily Bradley
1854–Deceased

Maria Bradley
1856–Deceased

John Bradley
1858–Deceased

William Bradley
1865–Deceased

Annie Bradley
1866–Deceased

Thomas Bradley
1871–1875

Martha Bradley
1874–1950

Mary Bradley
1880–Deceased

Thomas Bradley
1884-1949

Florence and Thomas got married in 1907. Given that Doris their daughter was born in the last quarter of 1907 she followed quickly after the marriage (could it have been a shotgun wedding?). I have the following as children of Thomas and Florence. But because they're not my direct ancestors, I haven't got as much detail as I have for direct ancestors.

Doris Bradley
1907–Deceased

Ivy Bradley
1909–Deceased

Lily Bradley
1911–Deceased

May Bradley
1912–Deceased

Violet Bradley
1914–Deceased

Mona Bradley
1916–Deceased

I also couldn't find a death date for Florence but I had a query in my notes that a Florrie/Florence Bradley died in 1944 and was estimated to have been born around 1880. I wondered if that was the right one but I haven't checked it because I'm off on another branch for now. Women often lied about their ages - either because they were much older than their spouse or because they were too young to get married. So as you probably already know you have to take a bit of give or take on birth dates. My own grandad had a completely made up birthdate because his parents forgot to register him and didn't want to get into trouble so his official birth date is not his real one. What were people in the olden days like eh?

Hope that helps you.

Also be careful as there is more than one Thomas Bradley in this area - it was a common name - and more than one Florence/Florrie Bradley. The Bradley family was huge and Thomas was a family name. Note that John and Sarah had another child called Thomas who died and they recycled the name. 

Another hint - you can search Retford Cemetery for graves. I did that for you and I found there was a Thomas Bradley who was buried in 1949. His grave ID is 49,427.00 FID   34747 Plot   95
There is no Florence Bradley buried in the cemetery according to the search and it is not on his record. But from experience I've discovered that the second person buried in the grave often doesn't come up in their fairly crappy search capabilities. If you really are stuck and can't get there, I'll have a look the next time I go to see my grandparents and see if I can find the gravestone as there might be more clues on that - for example a wife buried there or indication of where she is buried. Here's the link to the grave search in case it helps you or others. But remember Retford cemetery only opened in 1854 so if your ancestors died before then they'd be in a church cemetery not in this one.

https://www.bassetlaw.gov.uk/community-and-living/cemeteries-in-bassetlaw/cemetery-deceased-search/

If you want to go further back in the Bradley or Nettleship families then I have linked it all into a tree on familysearch so you should be able to find a lot of info there.


Pages: [1]