1
Devon / Re: Squires in buckland and surrounding
« on: Saturday 09 August 25 11:51 BST (UK) »
I'm sorry you are correct
I'll see if I'm able to edit it to get it all right
I'll see if I'm able to edit it to get it all right
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Devon / Re: Squires in buckland and surrounding
« on: Saturday 09 August 25 10:58 BST (UK) »
Buckland brewer from what I'm finding and in the surrounding areas
Sorry I should of been more specific
Sorry I should of been more specific
3
Devon / Squires in buckland and surrounding
« on: Saturday 09 August 25 10:46 BST (UK) »
So I'm.confusing myself and feels like I'm going around in circles with a few people in my family tree.
John squire born around Buckland brewer Devon possibly in 1818. Buckland is place given in cencuse but no more information regarding which Buckland
Married Jane marshell in 1840 or 41 I can't remember off the top of my head.
They are in Devon in 1841 cencus then move to St woolos Newport and are in the cencus there on.
They have daughters Amelia squire marshell out of wedlock in 1837
Mary ann in 1842 both born in Devon.
Now the only John squire born around the dates and place given in cencuse is John squire born to Daniel squire a yeoman and Sarah in 1817.
Could be other child but occupation is different or not given.
Found a Daniel and Sarah marrying in 1796, with that looking for Daniels birth found one in Bradford Devon to a Elizabeth squire in 1770 no fathers name given.
But it's not impossible but almost for a child born out of wedlock to become a yeoman.
Am I'm looking at the wrong people ?
As I said feel like I'm now going in circles.
Thank you for your help in advance
John squire born around Buckland brewer Devon possibly in 1818. Buckland is place given in cencuse but no more information regarding which Buckland
Married Jane marshell in 1840 or 41 I can't remember off the top of my head.
They are in Devon in 1841 cencus then move to St woolos Newport and are in the cencus there on.
They have daughters Amelia squire marshell out of wedlock in 1837
Mary ann in 1842 both born in Devon.
Now the only John squire born around the dates and place given in cencuse is John squire born to Daniel squire a yeoman and Sarah in 1817.
Could be other child but occupation is different or not given.
Found a Daniel and Sarah marrying in 1796, with that looking for Daniels birth found one in Bradford Devon to a Elizabeth squire in 1770 no fathers name given.
But it's not impossible but almost for a child born out of wedlock to become a yeoman.
Am I'm looking at the wrong people ?
As I said feel like I'm now going in circles.
Thank you for your help in advance
4
Renfrewshire / Re: Elizabeth Thomson
« on: Friday 25 April 25 08:46 BST (UK) »
That is insane, seem iv still much to learn. How do you even verify with no baptism. Still going through early 1800s so haven't gone that far back as yet
Only issue iv found so far beside this is siblings liked to give their kids the same names which gets confusing
Only issue iv found so far beside this is siblings liked to give their kids the same names which gets confusing
5
Renfrewshire / Re: Elizabeth Thomson
« on: Friday 25 April 25 07:37 BST (UK) »
I have attended image of the marriage record for James and Elizabeth in 1841.
This is the first tome I have come across ancestors that have not been Baptised especially in lockwinnoch so it seemed very odd to me that their wasn't any definite proof.
Thank you both for looking
This is the first tome I have come across ancestors that have not been Baptised especially in lockwinnoch so it seemed very odd to me that their wasn't any definite proof.
Thank you both for looking
6
Renfrewshire / Elizabeth Thomson
« on: Thursday 24 April 25 19:10 BST (UK) »
Hi
I'm looking for the parents/siblings of Elizabeth Thomson born around 1815/16 according to census records.
She married James Brodie in 1841 in lockwinnoch.
Census records says she was born in lockwinnoch and a Geneanet community tree on ancestry says her parents were Peter Thomson and Jean Mcintosh born and she was on 16/03/1816 which I'm not finding proof off. Her death record in Feb 1897 Paisley also has her parents as Peter Thompson and Jean.
Please help , thank you
I'm looking for the parents/siblings of Elizabeth Thomson born around 1815/16 according to census records.
She married James Brodie in 1841 in lockwinnoch.
Census records says she was born in lockwinnoch and a Geneanet community tree on ancestry says her parents were Peter Thomson and Jean Mcintosh born and she was on 16/03/1816 which I'm not finding proof off. Her death record in Feb 1897 Paisley also has her parents as Peter Thompson and Jean.
Please help , thank you
7
Cork / Re: Murphy and Reeves Rathpeacon
« on: Friday 21 March 25 07:02 GMT (UK) »
Hello, reading this with great interest as Catherine and Thomas are in my family tree.
Ellen's brother Thomas Murphy he was one of the older siblings wheres Ellen one of the oldest
Ellen's brother Thomas Murphy he was one of the older siblings wheres Ellen one of the oldest
8
Surrey / Re: Rayner's
« on: Tuesday 23 July 24 15:00 BST (UK) »
Thank you, I hadn't checked yet
Was looking at baptism of William john Rayner, abot his there is an William and Elizabeth Rayner baptised son Frederick on the same day both living in Sutton.
And if the census I'm looking at it would seem Alice does have a brother called William who marries an Elizabeth
Seems that we may be on the right lines of this
Was looking at baptism of William john Rayner, abot his there is an William and Elizabeth Rayner baptised son Frederick on the same day both living in Sutton.
And if the census I'm looking at it would seem Alice does have a brother called William who marries an Elizabeth
Seems that we may be on the right lines of this
9
Surrey / Re: Rayner's
« on: Tuesday 23 July 24 14:29 BST (UK) »
So I have looked into them and does seem like there both staying else where in 1911.
Going to try search the 1921 census for them and also looking at possible census for alice before she had kids, I found her in the 1871 census with her father and siblings but there is also a granddaughter living with them and checking the 1861 alice seems to be the oldest child.
She may have had a child at 16/17 years of age
Going to try search the 1921 census for them and also looking at possible census for alice before she had kids, I found her in the 1871 census with her father and siblings but there is also a granddaughter living with them and checking the 1861 alice seems to be the oldest child.
She may have had a child at 16/17 years of age