1
Family History Beginners Board / Re: family search website - reliable?
« on: Monday 16 December 24 12:58 GMT (UK) »And on FS (at least when it was the IGI) there are two types of record - extracted records which have been taken from a parish record, census return or some other original record. And submitted records which have been contributed by users.
These submitted records may be accurate, but may contain assumptions, such as age of bride and groom on marriage (I have seen some - pre 1837 -, where groom is always 25 and bride is always 21). Sometimes a baptism record and a death record have been linked together as one record. They could be correct, but it would be rare for the actual baptism record to be annotated with date of death or burial, unless events were very close to each other.
And on the subject of other people's assumptions. Look carefully at any BMD certificates people have attached to their trees, whether it be FS, Ancestry or any other tree hosting platform. I have seen some where the tree owner has written assumed information on the copy of the Certificate they have bought, then uploaded it to their tree. An E and W (post 1837) marriage Cert will have names of fathers of the couple and their occupations, It will not have the fathers' date and place of birth as I saw on one cert a while back, which led another descendent of the couple on a time consuming wild goose chase.
Ohh yes I think this is the problem. People are uploading documents to people and then they're seen as official source?
My family all have a really common Christian names and surnames which is leading to someone finding "john Smith A" and thinking its "John Smith B".