1
Kent / Re: Adoption Tonbridge Kent in 1870s
« on: Tuesday 29 July 25 00:33 BST (UK) »
Purely considering those DNA results, may I suggest another possible explanation is that George Henry Field was not your mother-in-law's biological grandfather at all, and that a son of William Brown & Deborah Riley was (for example, through an NPE involving your mother-in-law's grandmother).
This sort of thing was incredibly common ... I've come across it quite a bit in my tree. It would perhaps make more sense than an adoption in the circumstances you describe.
Did William Brown & Deborah Riley have any sons together? Have you traced those sons' lives - where they were living around the time your mother-in-law's parent was born?
This could of course be way off the mark, and apologies if you've already discounted it, but just wanted to offer another explanation for these results.
This sort of thing was incredibly common ... I've come across it quite a bit in my tree. It would perhaps make more sense than an adoption in the circumstances you describe.
Did William Brown & Deborah Riley have any sons together? Have you traced those sons' lives - where they were living around the time your mother-in-law's parent was born?
This could of course be way off the mark, and apologies if you've already discounted it, but just wanted to offer another explanation for these results.