1
Leicestershire / Re: William Chaplin Whittle
« on: Sunday 20 August 23 15:50 BST (UK) »
a-l Sue
Did you want to compare notes regarding the Whittle family?
Did you want to compare notes regarding the Whittle family?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Pages: [1]
2
Leicestershire / Re: William Chaplin Whittle
« on: Sunday 20 August 23 15:49 BST (UK) »
CaroleW
Clara Baines had another child in 1940, too. Yes William was with Tessie Maud Birch until he died.
Clara Baines had another child in 1940, too. Yes William was with Tessie Maud Birch until he died.
3
Leicestershire / Re: William Chaplin Whittle
« on: Sunday 20 August 23 11:07 BST (UK) »
David
Thank you so much. These dates are very important. You are a star.
Thank you so much. These dates are very important. You are a star.
4
Leicestershire / Re: Whittle family
« on: Sunday 20 August 23 07:12 BST (UK) »
Jool
Would you be able to find out about the next court case of William C Whittle. See you comment from Birmingham Daily Gazette 23 December 1932. It was adjourned for 28 days. Thank you.
Would you be able to find out about the next court case of William C Whittle. See you comment from Birmingham Daily Gazette 23 December 1932. It was adjourned for 28 days. Thank you.
5
Leicestershire / William Chaplin Whittle
« on: Saturday 19 August 23 08:55 BST (UK) »
Could someone please find out what to this court case.
Many thanks
Birmingham Daily Gazette 23 December 1932.
"William C. Whittle applied for an order under the Married Woman's Act made against him in respect of his wife, Clara Whittle, of Waterloo Square, Hinckley, to be revoked. Respondent did not appear but it was stated that a doctor had certified her as unfit to attend court and the application was adjourned for 28 days."
Many thanks
Birmingham Daily Gazette 23 December 1932.
"William C. Whittle applied for an order under the Married Woman's Act made against him in respect of his wife, Clara Whittle, of Waterloo Square, Hinckley, to be revoked. Respondent did not appear but it was stated that a doctor had certified her as unfit to attend court and the application was adjourned for 28 days."
Pages: [1]