Hi all,
Looking at a birth registration for an illegitimate ancestor, obviously a father's name wasn't listed, but by her marriage, a man is listed as her mother's now husband ie; Jane D now married to Thomas M...
I cant remember which record I have also seen that the mother had 'subsequently married to' ... on the registration.
Is it possible (being that the marriage of the Mother and 'father' occurred only months after the birth of the illegitimate ancestor) that the man she married is in fact the child's biological father?
By the time of the child's death registration, the 'father' is named as him. There are no corrected entries on the birth registration and I cant find any sheriffs paternity decree relating to this child. her death is indexed under 3 different surnames: the 'Father's' surname, and her two married surnames.
I am just not sure if the terms ' subsequently married' or 'now married to' are the clue I need in comfortably accepting this man's paternity
Thanks all in advance for your insight.