1
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Divorce Law in 1933 relating to 5th section (18 & 19?)
« on: Monday 25 January 21 15:47 GMT (UK) »
I know I'm late to the party but I have just come across this correction on a marriage entry too. I know the couple separated - she left him and went to Canada too - and many years later the entry was corrected at his instance I assume so he could remarry.
Section 2: Objections to marriage
9. Section 5 of the 1977 Act currently provides for situations where there is an objection to
a marriage proceeding. Section 5(4) lists the legal impediments to a marriage. These include
... or where one or both parties are not domiciled in Scotland and marriage would be void according to the law of the party‘s domicile.
Section 2: Objections to marriage
9. Section 5 of the 1977 Act currently provides for situations where there is an objection to
a marriage proceeding. Section 5(4) lists the legal impediments to a marriage. These include
... or where one or both parties are not domiciled in Scotland and marriage would be void according to the law of the party‘s domicile.
Here's hoping she gets an email too. Her Joseph McConachie would have been my grandmother's cousin. I had the names Eliza Jane McIntyre and William Ross drummed into me at a young age. My nan said she never knew her grandparents from Ireland. And look! Eliza and her new husband were there in Shotts too in 1901 with Minnie and the rest of the family! How did my nan not know? I am beginning to think all my gr grandfather's family left Scotland as I can't find them after 1901. This might explain why I have so many 4th cousin DNA matches in Pennsylvania! How sad that my gr grandfather, Samuel Ross, felt he couldn't tell his own family. He made up a lie that his family had been murdered in Ireland and he ran away to Scotland aged 16 so he wasn't next.