Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - octochamp

Pages: [1]
1
Lancashire / Re: Please help me to return this CANNON Family Bible...
« on: Tuesday 21 February 06 17:07 GMT (UK)  »
There's just a possibility that I may be vaguely connected with a Jane Cannon who married Miles Wilson in Crosthwaite, Cumberland on 22/12/1851. Her father was recorded as John.

Any links?

Stuart

2
Cumberland Lookup Requests / Re: 1901 census lookup please: Grasmere or Keswick
« on: Monday 20 February 06 14:21 GMT (UK)  »
I have a thread which might weave into my tree involving a Birkett from Crosthwaite. Is it any link to your family?

My link is through the Wilson family of High Lodore farm, to Thomas Wilson who married Mary Birkett in Crosthwaite on 31/07/1809. She was baptised in Crosthwaite 22/09/1765 - seemingly the daughter of John Birkett bapt. 13/09/1720 and maybe an Elizabeth Rig. John may be the child of William Birkett and Agnes Crosthwaite who were married in Crosthwaite 24/11/1719.

Does any of this ring any bells?

Thanks,

Stuart

3
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Monday 20 February 06 10:22 GMT (UK)  »
Oops - I've got the details of Elizabeth's baptism too! The message should have read:

More on the Thomas Cooper marriage to Mary Haggisse. Leveritt lists it as mary's first marriage and Thomas ' second (though he hasn't got any detail about the first one). I think you are right, because the dates don't tally at all.

According to Leveritt, Thomas had three children (supposedly by Mary H) - Ann (baptised at Henlow 07/09/1650), Elizabeth (baptised at Henlow 02/02/1654) and Mary (baptised at Henlow 22/07/1656).

Is it not right that the baptism registers of the time would not give the maiden name of the married mother - so the entry presumably will read "parents: Thomas Cooper and Mary Cooper" - in which case one wonders where Leveritt's marriage to Mary Haggisse comes from - looks like an odd leap of speculation, but he doesn't mention any specific sources, except Ian Gray from whom he seems to have taken quite a lot. Gray is the source of much of this but he doesn't seem to want to reveal his sources to me!

Hope this reassures you. Would that others were more careful with their research...

Stuart

4
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Monday 20 February 06 10:19 GMT (UK)  »
More on the Thomas Cooper marriage to Mary Haggisse. Leveritt lists it as mary's first marriage and Thomas ' second (though he hasn't got any detail about the first one). I think you are right, because the dates don't tally at all.

According to Leveritt, Thomas had three children (supposedly by Mary) - Ann (baptised at Henlow 07/09/1650), Elizabeth (baptised at Henlow 1654) and Mary (baptised at Henlow 22/07/1656).

Is it not right that the baptism registers of the time would not give the maiden name of the married mother - so the entry presumably will read "parents: Thomas Cooper and Mary Cooper" - in which case one wonders where Leveritt's marriage to Mary Haggisse comes from - looks like an odd leap of speculation, but he doesn't mention any specific sources, except Ian Gray from whom he seems to have taken quite a lot. Gray is the source of much of this but he doesn't seem to want to reveal his sources to me!

Hope this reassures you. Would that others were more careful with their research...

Stuart

5
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Sunday 19 February 06 19:55 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for your long and detailed reply. I fear I can't give much to you in response. On the Thomas Cooper marriage, I have no evidence - just a steal from (I suspect) the Leveritt tree on Genes Reunited. So your records may well be more authentic.

With regard to your lengthy discussion of missed burials, this isn't part of my tree, the last Thomas Cooper I have born in Henley is the 1626 one.

With regard to the Mary Turner/ John Earl/Thomas Earl conundrum, I have the same burial date for Thomas Earl, but have his age recorded as 86, which would give a birth year of 1745, making Mary only 49... Not impossible. Stretching probability, but no more than that.

Thanks for the info on John Green - that makes me more confident.

The tree goes like this:
1.   Stuart Earl         1959   whose father was
2.   Gordon John Earl      1929   whose father was
3.   Walter John Earl      1884   whose father was
4.   William Absalom Earl   1865   whose father was
5.   William Earl      1830   whose father was
6.   Thomas Earl      1806   whose father was
7.   George Earl      1782   whose father was
8.   Thomas Earl      1745   whose father was
9.   John Earl         1698   who married Mary Turner (b. 1696), whose father was
10.   John Turner      1650   who married Elizabeth Cooper (b. 1654), whose father was
11.   Thomas Cooper      1626   whose father was
12.   Benjamin Cooper      1575   whose father was
13.   Edmund Cooper      1542   whose father was
14.   Michael Cooper      ????   who married Elizabeth Page (b. 1515), whose father was
15.   Robert Page      1477   who married Cicely Green (b. 1472), whose father was
16.   John Green      1445   whose father was
17.   Thomas Greene      1421   whose father was
18.   Thomas Greene      1400   whose father was
19.   Thomas Greene      1369   whose father was
20.   Thomas de Greene      1345   whose father was
21.   Henry Greene      1310   whose father was
22.   Thomas de Greene      1292   who married Lucy la Zouche (b. 1292), whose father was
23.   Eudo la Zouche      1244   who married Millicent de Cantelupe (b. 1250) whose father was
24.   William de Cantelupe   1215   whose father was
25.   William de Cantelupe   1168   who married Millicent Gournay (b. 1170), whose father was
26.   Hugh Gournay      1140   whose father was
27.   Hugues de Gournay      1100   whose father was
28.   Gerard Gournay      1075   who married Edith de Warren (????), whose father was
29.   William de Warren      1040   whose father was
30.   Ralph de Warren      1015   who married Beatrice de Normandie (1020), whose father was
31.   Richard de Normandie   1001   whose father was
32.   Richard de Normandie    963   (“The Good”) whose father was
33.   Richard de Normandie    933   (“Sans Peur”) whose father was
34.   Guillaume de Normandie    895   (“Long Epee”) whose father was
35.   Rollo Rognovaldsson    846   born Maer, Norway, whose father was
36.   Rognvald Eysteinsson    830   (“The Wise”), whose father was
37.   Eystein Ivarsson       800   (“Glumra”), born Maer, Norway, whose father was
38.   Ivar Halfdanssen       770   born Oppland, Norway, whose father was
39.   Halfdan Sveidassen       700   (“The Aged”), whose father was
40.   Sveide Svidrasson       650   (“The Sea King”), whose father was
41.   Svidri Heytsson       600   born Raumsdal, Norway, whose father was
42.   Heytir Gorrson                 c.570   who was also born in Raumsdal.

If you're still awake after all that, maybe you could proffer any comments?

Oh and there's another strand which goes via the Ferrers/Despenser route to Edward the First, and another that goes via the la Zouche/Fergent/de Bretagne/Vermandois/Pepins route to Charlemagne.

Zzzzzzzz...

Stuart

Thanks again,

Stuart

6
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Sunday 19 February 06 14:53 GMT (UK)  »
Hello again!

The Mormons have records of an Absalom Foster baptised in Biggleswade on 05/11/1777, the child of John and Susan Foster. Further investigations shows that John was born in Biggleswade about 1738 and buried in Biggleswade on 18/07/1802, and that Susan was born about 1742 in Biggleswade and buried there on 12/04/1811.

Has anyone got any way of verifying any of this?

Is it just that poor old Absalom couldn't add up on the 1851 census as to how old he was...?

Cheers,

Stuart

7
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Sunday 19 February 06 14:02 GMT (UK)  »
Dear Bedforshire Boy, I've just had another look over my tree and it is through the Earl/Turner line rather than the Earl/Roberts line that I have made the longest links.

The problem link for me is a link between a John Green born about 1445 and Sir Thomas Green born 1421. The Aussie link has them as father-son, but I can't find any corroboration elsewhere. Is this your discrepancy?

Sorry I didn't sign off properly last time (I didn't know whether you were supposed to be so friendly!)

Cheers,

Stuart

8
Bedfordshire / Re: Earl family in Clifton area
« on: Sunday 19 February 06 13:42 GMT (UK)  »
Hello everyone - I'm BE's brother - the one who's been tracing the family back to Noggin the Nog and Priam of Troy. (not!)

I've just joined rootschat so am a bit late on the scene. What fascinates me is the certainty with which Bedfordshire boy pours doubt on certain links in the chain. I may be being a bit thick - but how can you access the tree to see where the links are going - or is it my Australian friend's tree that you can somehow access?

Please give me a clue as to where you have spotted the discrepancy/ break in the tree - and also where you think there is an authentic line running back to Charlie himself in the eighth century. It'd save me a heck of a lot of work!

Thanks for the useful info so far - Ann Bland was a great bit of sleuthing.


Pages: [1]