Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Darren S

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6
1
Bedfordshire / Re: The Murder of John PAYNE of Billington
« on: Thursday 11 January 18 13:02 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Mark

Thanks for writing! It seems there are quite a few people descended from the murdered John Pain.

Did you notice on the previous page that the burial record showed that John was 56 at the time of death? So he can't be the one who was baptised in 1754. That's probably someone else with the same name (maybe a cousin or even older brother who died). But everything else is correct including the marriage to Ann Proctor. There were three other children after William 1792, including another Elizabeth whose descendant also wrote in this thread.

2
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: Woo hoo 1911 census!!!
« on: Tuesday 08 February 11 11:00 GMT (UK)  »
But some will only have access to 1911 census for free for a limited amount of time and viewings.  This happened last year in some libraries.

So check with your local library to see what sites they have access to and if it is free for a limited period.


The library nearest my work in Hampshire which I have been using for Ancestry access, have recently got free access to FindMyPast as well, much to my surprise. I think it's available in many Hampshire libraries (though their website hasn't been updated with this). So as long as the 1911 census is free with the FindMyPast Library edition, it will be accessible, hopefully!

3
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: Free 1911 Census Access
« on: Friday 07 August 09 23:40 BST (UK)  »
Two hours for 35 miles on the M4. Surely you can do better by train!

Actually, given that I live 4 miles away from the nearest train station, and that Kew is nowhere near the lines from London to Reading, it would have probably taken longer than that.  ;) The journey normally takes about 50 minutes by car, but as I said, there were big problems on the M4 that Friday afternoon.

But we digress..  :D

4
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: Free 1911 Census Access
« on: Monday 03 August 09 15:16 BST (UK)  »
Hi Ruskie,

Afraid not - I took a day's holiday to go to Kew as a one-off. I live about 35 miles away, it actually took me 2 hours to get back on the afternoon I went due to problems on the M4!  >:(

I would have preferred to email the census images to myself (as I have done with the 1841-1901 censuses when viewing them at the local library), but the computers are very locked down at TNA, there's no access to a hard drive or USB devices, so no ability to save an attachment, also all email sites are blocked, so they've done a good job there. Plus the T&Cs clearly state that you mustn't use the system for any of those purposes. I am a fairly techy person who works in IT, and there was definitely no way around their security, even if I had dared to use it...

I went purely to view the scans, having already found the records I wanted through the 1911 site without spending a penny. I had already established most of what I wanted to know; I was mostly interested in seeing other, more minor bit of information, such as occupations, children born/died/total/years of marriage, etc.

Darren

5
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: Free 1911 Census Access
« on: Monday 03 August 09 15:04 BST (UK)  »
Hi Ruskie,

Afraid not - I took a day's holiday to go to Kew as a one-off. I live about 35 miles away, it actually took me 2 hours to get back on the afternoon I went due to problems on the M4!  >:(

I would have preferred to email the census images to myself (as I have done with the 1841-1901 censuses when viewing them at the local library), but the computers are very locked down at TNA, there's no access to a hard drive or USB devices, so no ability to save an attachment, also all email sites are blocked, so they've done a good job there. Plus the T&Cs clearly state that you mustn't use the system for any of those purposes. I am a fairly techy person who works in IT, and there was definitely no way around their security, even if I had dared to use it...

I went purely to view the scans, having already found the records I wanted through the 1911 site without spending a penny. I had already established most of what I wanted to know; I was mostly interested in seeing other, more minor bit of information, such as occupations, children born/died/total/years of marriage, etc.

Darren

6
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: Free 1911 Census Access
« on: Monday 03 August 09 14:22 BST (UK)  »
It's strange the press release doesn't mention that the 1911 census is already free to view at the National Archives in Kew, and has been for some time.

I went there about a month ago; there were literally hundreds of terminals available, and you didn't even need to sign in or anything, just turn up, sit at a terminal and start searching! Apparently they have relaxed their security there recently, you only need reader's cards to get into the reading rooms. They have a large free carpark as well.

You just need to go armed with cash to buy printouts of the sheets, at 20p a go. I got all mine printed out in one day, I think I spent £3.60.

Darren

7
Anglesey Lookup Requests / Re: PARRY family - Anglesey
« on: Friday 17 July 09 11:32 BST (UK)  »
Hi Derek,

I can't help you with your question, but I suspect we might have some sort of a connection.

My Great-Great Grandfather, James Smith, had parents Thomas Smith and Helen Parry. They married in early 1837 in Holyhead, unfortunately just missing civil registration, although the marriage is in the IGI.

It is suspected that Parry is not Helen's maiden name (she was born in approx 1803 in Beaumaris). She had a daughter, Matilda Helen Parry, born in approximately 1827. Matilda is shown on the 1851 census incorrectly as Matilda Smith. She went on to marry Jacob Mealing Mills in 1854 in West Derby, Liverpool.

Either Helen had been married before to a Mr Parry, or Matilda was illegitimate. These were actually fairly well-to-do types, that tended to have less illegitimacy.

Now, what leads me to suspect that we have a match is that according to the 1891 census, Matilda was born in Llandsaint, Angelsey. I suspect that this is an alternate spelling of Llanddeusant. (Incidentally, in 1861 her birth place is given as Llanheddi - I can't find anywhere named this and this may be a handwriting issue).

From what I can tell, Llanddeusant looks like a fairly small place, so if there are Parrys in that area, maybe they're related? Maybe your William Parry is Helen Parry's brother? Alternatively, maybe Helen's mysterious first husband is your William Parry's brother? Do you have any thoughts?

Thanks
Darren


8
Census and Resource Discussion / Re: BMD transcription by Ancestry
« on: Saturday 11 July 09 10:47 BST (UK)  »
The OCR that Ancestry have used to transcribe the indexes is not perfect, largely due to the condition of the source index sheets that have been used.

I've found many of my relatives, who should be in there, at first glance aren't. That's because the OCR has misread one of the letters in the name (typically the mother's maiden name). For example, Harris is transcribed as Barris, Garrard as Carrard, De Gaetano as De Gaetans, etc.

So it's likely that your record is there, but mistranscribed. For the one you're missing, try searching without the surname and with the mother's maiden name, or with the forename, district and quarter, etc. You'll probably find it.

9
The Lighter Side / Re: Even More Revelations from the 1911 Census
« on: Sunday 25 January 09 23:14 GMT (UK)  »
I wonder how many of these occupations are actually written in the census, and how many of them are added by bored transcribers on a Friday afternoon? Just a thought...  ::)

Great work, everyone... can't believe how this thread has ballooned since I contributed on about page 3!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6