1
Cumberland / Re: Jackson-Rigg marriage @ Muncaster 1863
« on: Saturday 21 July 18 12:37 BST (UK) »
Louisa Maud,
I get the impression that Thomas was a bit of a rough diamond who had lived a fairly footloose and fancy-free life from quite an early age. I also sense that Hannah had been around the block a few times herself. She had had her child while in domestic service, which must have caused its own complications - the child was fostered out locally. It's possible that Thomas was the father of the child, but he never quite got round to describing her as 'daughter' in the censuses.
Yes, they were older than average when they married: Thomas 33; Hannah 28; but not excessively so.
I get the impression that Thomas was a bit of a rough diamond who had lived a fairly footloose and fancy-free life from quite an early age. I also sense that Hannah had been around the block a few times herself. She had had her child while in domestic service, which must have caused its own complications - the child was fostered out locally. It's possible that Thomas was the father of the child, but he never quite got round to describing her as 'daughter' in the censuses.
Yes, they were older than average when they married: Thomas 33; Hannah 28; but not excessively so.