Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DougTCanada

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6
1
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Wednesday 04 April 18 23:05 BST (UK)  »
For anyone following this thread or who stumbles upon it through Google (like I did) -  a DNA test I had done pretty much confirms that Elizabeth Ing is the right person. The test reports that I had a  " grandparent who was 100% Scandinavian. This person was likely born between 1740 and 1830." 

That is Elizabeth Ing.





I have discovered something very useful. Sometimes all good things come to those who wait.  I have been using FamilySearch.org to track and record my family tree. For one, it is free and viewable by any family members who are interested. The information will always be there because genealogy is an important thing for the Mormons. More important is that it is crowd sourced. Information that is put in a family tree is checked by others and it is added to. Have you seen the junk in Acestry.com  trees that just keeps replicating? Yikes!

The "waiting" part, aside waiting for others to add to one's work, is that the program itself seems to run an algorithm every once in a while that will automatically add people to your family tree. That is what happened with the "Ing" family.   

I added Elizabeth Ing as the correct spouse to Jonathan Hastings. Several days later when I checked back magically all the people you are searching so hard for were added to the tree. Goes back as far as Marke Ingwald who married Ann in 1674.

You can see it all with a free account at familysearch.org   ;D

Because there seems to be more information available we may have been led totally off base by looking in the Berkshire direction for Hastings especially looking at Hagbourne which is 30 miles away from Little Marlow. There are other candidates in Buckinghamshire that are closer. There is a William Hasting who marries Elizabeth Turner (or "Turnr." ) in West Wycombe in 1725 a mere 6 miles away. I am sure there are more Hastings in the area just that the info isn't readily available. There is also some in Wendover which is 16 miles away. William "Haston" b. 1725 to William and Mary. 

Yikes,  this is not going to be easy.

The water is certainly getting muddier Doug, I'm hoping more info coming on line will help me with a Hill associated Ing line, I have three consecutive Ing families for whom in spite of two searches by the Bucks Family History site in their database, plus searches in surrounding counties where possible, the marriages remain a mystery.  :(

Mark Ing to Ann c1673, 1st known child An baptised 1675.

William Ing to Mary c1715, 1st known child John baptised 1718.

William Ing to Mary c1742, 1st known child Ann baptised 1744.

All known children of those three families were baptised in Long Crendon, Bucks

So I guess we can expect some more muddying of the water in the years to come.

I'm now in the process of looking at Charlotte Louisa Russell versus Charlotte Webb.

2
I have done something similar and relate my family's history with the events going on in the world at the time and give some background as to what the norms were for the times. Most people are not to interested in the minute details of dates of baptism etc. so my family history is more of a narrative.

3
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Friday 02 February 18 17:11 GMT (UK)  »
A bit off topic but it seems our "paths" cross again somewhat as my Bullen ancestors were from the Chelmsford area originally back in the 1700's and early 1800's before moving to Stratford. One made his way to Australia and from my snooping I believe I still have Bullen family there :)

4
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Thursday 01 February 18 01:59 GMT (UK)  »
We have a James Hill that shows up on one census and a Thomas that shows up on another. Both are about the same age. I saw a family tree at Ancestry today that had him as James Thomas Hill b. 1827. I didn't check if they had a source for that. I do know they had the death date wrong. They had it as 1896 and it was an infant that died on that date.

A page or two back you had a list of Hill kids' christenings which I  believe you gleaned from parish records. There is a "James" on that list. I would think that if he was really "James Thomas" that would have been the name used in the parish record.

Needs more investigation I guess.

5
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Wednesday 31 January 18 23:57 GMT (UK)  »
I did find Sarah's marriage on May 27, 1855 in Hammersmith. Her age is stated as 18 which would make her born in 1837. If I understand correctly births before September 1837 were not registered which helps explain why it is so hard to find exactly when and where she was born.

6
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Wednesday 31 January 18 20:25 GMT (UK)  »
Oh! Meaning that Sarah was christened as an adult? Well I guess that eliminates her then  :D

Thank you!

7
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Wednesday 31 January 18 19:39 GMT (UK)  »
Regarding Caroline's sister Sarah Hill who would have been born anywhere between 1837 and 1839 depending on which census you want to believe... finding her birth is an issue. From everything I have seen and using the process of elimination the most likely candidate may be Sarah Hill who was baptized May 17, 1839 in Hayes, Hillingdon. The parents names are not on the parish register. It looks like someone made an error and crossed it off and then never bothered to fill in the info. All of the other children on the page have their parents named.




8
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Wednesday 31 January 18 12:44 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for investigating further and clearing that up :)

9
London and Middlesex / Re: Drayton? in Middlesex?
« on: Tuesday 30 January 18 03:29 GMT (UK)  »
It looks like back in the 1790's births were not recorded as being in Hillingdon.

So often people's ages /  birthdates vary between census years. 3 to 5 years is not unusual. I would think that when it is consistent it adds great credibility. 1796 would have a high probability of being correct  in my opinion.


Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6