Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Alison Terao

Pages: [1]
1
The Lighter Side / Re: Longest timespan of parent and child?
« on: Wednesday 16 August 17 19:48 BST (UK)  »
My 3x great grandfather was born in 1807. He married at 19and had his first child when he was 20 (and my 2x great grandfather in 1830 when he was 22).

He went on to have 24 children with 2 wives - the last child born in 1882 when he was 75 and his second much younger wife was 42.

That last daughter lived to be 87, and died in 1970.

The father was born in 1807 and the daughter died in 1970. A span of 163 years.

According to family lore there was no doubt in the family that they were all his children.

2
The Lighter Side / Re: Largest family you have found
« on: Wednesday 10 August 16 12:27 BST (UK)  »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)

Not quite the same though, is it?   - the other large families shown here have all had the same mother!

That's true - and if you look at the children of the first wife only it drops to 15, which is still pretty impressive.

They were a fertile and hardy lot that line - they had large families with a good survival rate.


3
The Lighter Side / Re: Largest family you have found
« on: Wednesday 10 August 16 12:15 BST (UK)  »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.

Some more than others, by the look of it ....  ;)

My father's maiden aunt - his g-granddaughter  (herself one of 11 - 10 surviving who she raised when her mother died) used to say "they should have put a blue ribbon on it" 8)

4
The Lighter Side / Re: Largest family you have found
« on: Tuesday 09 August 16 12:37 BST (UK)  »
One of my ancestors had 25 children.

He married at 16 and took on his wife's first child when the father wouldn't marry her and they went on to have 14 children together.
When she died he went on to have 10 children with his second wife.

Most of the children lived to adulthood.

He died at 85 with all his faculties intact.




5
The Lighter Side / Re: How many convict relatives in your tree?
« on: Tuesday 09 August 16 11:32 BST (UK)  »
Well it's a little darker than that because in one case she was assigned to him from the "female factory" in Paramatta.
This doesn't mean she didn't choose it though, because contemporary accounts talk about new arrived convict women angling to be assigned to good prospects, who had been pardoned and had land.

6
The Lighter Side / Re: How many convict relatives in your tree?
« on: Tuesday 09 August 16 10:46 BST (UK)  »
I have 5 ... And of yet I've only traced my paternal line, so more may be awaiting discovery.

4 of those convicts are very early - 1790s - and the child of one set of convicts married the daughter of the other set.

The other was transported later and married an Irish immigrant woman.

7
Fife / Re: Robert Band -son of Robert Band and Elizabeth Walker
« on: Tuesday 09 August 16 09:12 BST (UK)  »
I'm surprised that Band is an unusual surname in the area as I'm also looking for Bands, and in particular Robert Band.

I'm tracing back from a Robert Band born 1800 in Dairsie who married Isabella Cunningham and emmigrated to Australia in the 1850s.

This Robert Band is the son of Robert Band and Elizabeth Peddie.

Robert Band married Elizabeth Peddie in Monmail in 1799.

This Robert Band may be the one born in 1758 in Kilrenny to James Band and Elizabeth Band. That makes him 41 at his marriage, which though old isn't impossible, especially if it's a second marriage.



 

Pages: [1]