Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - PrawnCocktail

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 82
1
The Common Room / Re: Free Access to Ancestry Military Records
« on: Saturday 08 November 25 12:06 GMT (UK)  »
Fold 3 does not appear to be free. It says it's free, but then demands card details, just as normal, when I try to view anything.

2
The Common Room / Re: Government Find a Will Service
« on: Wednesday 05 November 25 10:01 GMT (UK)  »
I can quite see why they've put it up - but I suspect they will have priced many of us out of the market.

Also just off to order a bunch of wills before the 17th!

3
The Common Room / Re: Unless I'm the last to find out...
« on: Thursday 23 October 25 11:17 BST (UK)  »
Afraid I've gone back to the old version.

The new one doesn't gve it to me in a concise enough format to cut and paste, and finding the other half of a marriage is so much harder! Especially when you're not sure exactly when the marriage was, or which of several it might be.

Life's too short.

  :'( :'( :'(

4
Same here. My father's maternal grandfather was an only child, who married an only child(!). Doesn't make for many matches, especially when we suspect that his father may also have been an only child! We've been looking for his (my 2g grandfather's) birth and parents for 50 years.

I've had 4 cousins contact me. One took a DNA test, and found she was adopted. The other three vanished into the woodwork when I mentioned "DNA test".  So no help there.

I have a few matches who have the fairly unusual surname in their trees, nearly all with roots in one village in Norfolk. And one friend, who looked startlingly like my father, turned up in my matches last year. He matches two others, and all three are descended from one illegitimate lady in Hackney. They match none of my other matches at all. But that is all I have after several years waiting. 

I have dozens of matches in my mother's tree. One couple have 35 matches descended from them! But my father's tree is much poorer. What with only children, and illegitimate children, it's been much more challenging.

5
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Ancestry Ethnicity Update
« on: Friday 10 October 25 10:58 BST (UK)  »
Well, my new one looks rubbish!

A total of 20% of it has been allocated to areas where I have no-one on the paper trail - East Midlands, Donegal, Central Scotland, and South Wales.

Added to which, I've only had two matches in the last week!

6
Shropshire / Re: How to find birth location from 1797
« on: Wednesday 24 September 25 11:33 BST (UK)  »
Went and found the Richard Frederick baptism in the St Nicholas BTs. Had to do it manually, as the entry isn't indexed.

Born 18 Aug 1795, bap Sep [illegible] Richard Frederick s Thomas Davies of Paradise Street and Sarah nee Oddie his wife, married Christ Church, London

7
The Lighter Side / Re: Headstones in cemeteries and the GDPR regulations
« on: Sunday 21 September 25 11:01 BST (UK)  »
There is enough information online to identify people, especially if they have anything unusual about their names. It's not long ago that I shocked fellow trustees of a charity I was a trustee for, by handing two of them (both married and female) a piece of paper which their mother's maiden name and at least one past address was written on. All I had needed was their everyday names and a good idea where they lived.

Any competent genealogist in the UK can fill in the boxes on Ancestry marked "private", unless there's a common surname involved. For that reason neither my daughter nor her children are included in my tree, which is also private.

8
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: Interpreting (not Deciphering) a 1706 Will
« on: Friday 12 September 25 10:28 BST (UK)  »
These years include the Civil War period, when many registers have few to no register entries for many years. And what there are are often the well-to-do or the clerk's own family, when you have a good look at them. It is nearly always difficult to bridge the Civil War gap. Registers frequently didn't restart straight after 1660, the country took a while to recover, and keeping records wasn't the top of their priority list. Many baptisms either didn't happen, or went unrecorded.

Culcheth seems to have been a chapelry of Winwick, and there is one entry in Winwick in 1661 for Elizabeth daughter of William of Culcheth.

I did also find, on FindMyPast, an entry on a list of marriages for 1676 for a William Bates and Margaret Rydings, labelled "Ould Withington". Unfortunately FindMyPast didn't say what the register was, nor can I find the marriage mentioned anywhere else!

9
Technical Help / Re: New Laptop
« on: Thursday 11 September 25 10:26 BST (UK)  »
I had to get a new laptop after the touchpad on my previous one died, and no-one would replace it.

Not wanting to transfer to Apple, I got a (another) basic Dell Inspiron, with Windows 11. Yes, I had to have Windows 365, but no, I don't use OneDrive (there are other ways to back up your stuff). I was a bit worried my Family History programme (PAF 4) wouldn't run on Win11, but it does.

I have to say the Win11 versions of Outlook, Paint and Photos are a definite step backwards, and I have downloaded Classic Outlook and Photos Legacy.

But I have hundreds of Word and Excel files, some very ancient, from 30 years of local history research. Transferring over to Apple, where my PAF programme wouldn't have run, would have been a nightmare.

I did run my Windows Vista laptop long past the date Microsoft stopped updating it, but while that kept going, sooner or later other programmes wouldn't run on my machine, and websites stopped loading properly. Eventually I was forced to purchase a new machine.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 82