1
Dublin / Re: Jane Buck abt 1795 Dublin
« on: Monday 31 July 17 17:44 BST (UK) »
Maggie:
We do not have definitive proof at the moment but the dates are right and there are clues in the Andrew names and the fact that legal deeds show Andrew pragmaticus (Esq) acting as lawyer to members of Rev Dr Andrew (clerics)'s family. With effectively no church records coming through, we are putting most effort into the newspaper searches and have found there just in the last fortnight details of a further sister of Jane's (Frances Buck married Vaughan Waldron in Dublin 1799). Newspapers have been invaluable!
There are also presumably a good number of other children of Jane's to be identified. I am hoping someone else traces their family back to one of those and posts here or on Ancestry! The elder ones would have been old enough at her death to be making their own way in life but it seems surprising only four young ones surfaced in England.
We do not have definitive proof at the moment but the dates are right and there are clues in the Andrew names and the fact that legal deeds show Andrew pragmaticus (Esq) acting as lawyer to members of Rev Dr Andrew (clerics)'s family. With effectively no church records coming through, we are putting most effort into the newspaper searches and have found there just in the last fortnight details of a further sister of Jane's (Frances Buck married Vaughan Waldron in Dublin 1799). Newspapers have been invaluable!
There are also presumably a good number of other children of Jane's to be identified. I am hoping someone else traces their family back to one of those and posts here or on Ancestry! The elder ones would have been old enough at her death to be making their own way in life but it seems surprising only four young ones surfaced in England.