Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tina Bean

Pages: [1]
1
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Sunday 28 February 16 00:29 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Brutus,
thank you. My Mother in Law actually had a copy of the Will. I thought she did and I asked her for it years ago and things happened so I didn't get it. So I now have a copy of the Will and need to spend some time reading it. As you say it is very long and complicated.
I would be really interested in getting the other information that you have though. I will be going through the information that my Mother in Law gave me the other day and seeing if I can find anything further of use to either of us. Unfortunately I don't think that she has much more on the Smith family. She is searching for some information but the majority of the information that she did have was stolen. It was in her aunts house in a fashionable suitcase and someone broke in and stole the whole suitcase with all of the information in it. It seems that the world is conspiring to help James hide his origins.
The letter that you mention, I also have a photocopy of. Some of the works are illegible in the photocopy. Do you have a better copy? Or more full and correct details.
I think that John Smith or (Gentleman Smith) as he was known, bashing may have occurred at the time just as much as it does now. I came across a piece in the news paper the other day which had one person running for the position of Alderman. In it he was running on a platform that was aimed at getting 'John Smith' to be treated the same as any other man and to have to pay the same proportion of rates as other men, for the amount of property they owned. This man did not get enough votes to become an Alderman. So I suspect that John Smith was a bit of a character and did both good things and bad things during his life. What a surprise, that makes him just like anyone else and also makes him much more interesting to research because it means that he has much more depth of character.

Thanks again, looking forward to hearing more from you. My original research into my own family, was also initially started in the days before computers and word processors and by writing to family members and individuals. So I understand where you are coming from.

Tina

2
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Thursday 25 February 16 11:12 GMT (UK)  »
I also found this which gives some rather interesting and colourful information about John Smith.
http://www.jenwilletts.com/john_smith.htm

Tina

3
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Thursday 25 February 16 11:06 GMT (UK)  »
Ah, OK that makes sense.
Indeed Gentleman Smith is a very shady character. So far I don't have confirmation of the birth place.

However, I do now have a bunch more information. See attachment as putting it into the message is too large.
I have included the link where I found that information at the end.

The Australian Newspaper Index Trove is coming back online over the next couple of days as well and I have found another bunch of Newspaper articles that I will have a look at over the next couple of days to see if there are any options in any of that stuff.

Thanks everyone for looking further. I am really pleased to see how well this search is going and how willing people are to help out.

Tina


4
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Thursday 25 February 16 08:27 GMT (UK)  »
Yes, I can see why your list gives you James as the eldest but I still don't have as much information as you do. I need more to see why you have come to the conclusions that you have. For example, I have James born about 1789. I also have nothing specific about where he is born other than 'Greater Manchester'. You obviously have more information that leads you to believe that Ardwick is the place and that there are other siblings. Help me to understand your reasoning for this so that I can also understand your concerns. This family is not one I have done a lot of research into and only looked at what I have for him today for the first time in about 10 years when I was last working on this family. At that time I had found two other potential sets of parents for James Sidebottom based on the information that I actually had at the time. Those sets of parents were; 29 Oct 1786 to Samuel and Martha Sidebottom nee Morgan married at the Manchester Cathedral 26 Feb 1786 and one christened 26 Nov 1786 to Joseph and Betty Sidebottom nee Chadwick marriage 21 Oct 1784.  Both of which are a couple of years out on the projected date but not impossible.

So what lead you to the conclusion Ardwick? Can I get copies of that information somewhere? If not can you send me to links that will help me understand your conclusions?

I have one set of records for James Sidebottom's convictions, not the quite extensive up and down that you have. Are you able to point me in the right direction for those as well. That way I can read them, make sure I have that information and make sure that I have any other facts that I seem to be missing.

Do you have an online tree somewhere that I can see with details of John Smith? Mine is at http://gransdenfamily.com/ with James Sidebottom very specifically at http://www.gransdenfamily.com/gransdenf/pafg119.htm#3667 do a search for John or Smith and you should find him, there are a few on that page.

Cheers,
Tina

5
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Thursday 25 February 16 07:21 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Brutus,
I don't have all of the children. I have 10 children in total and only 9 of those to John Smith, one of them is by Mary with her first husband. So I would love to do an information swap with you. I also do not have a copy of the Will from John Smith and yes would absolutely love a scanned copy if it if you are happy to share.
I agree that there is likely to be something a bit odd with the parents in the first place. Where did you get the birth location? My side of the family hasn't got anything so specific and in fact we have a birth date origin of a couple of years. It sounds like you have much more precise information than I do.
However, the family stories that come down to my children and to me do talk about James being a member of a rather prominent family in Manchester. They also say that he got his education and some money from them. They believe that he was a younger son of the family who "went bad" and that if he needed it, when he was in Australia he was able to get help from the family in the UK, at least initially.
Given where he ended up and how easily he was able to rise in Australian Society I would expect that his education was certainly quite reasonable. He certainly had extremely good hand writing etc. So while I certainly wonder about his origins I am not sure that the original details about his origins and his link to the family is incorrect. It certainly fits very well with the family stories. But maybe once I have more information I may come to be more of your mind.

Cheers,
Tina

6
Lancashire / Re: James Sidebottom (or Sidebotham)
« on: Wednesday 24 February 16 21:25 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Brutus,
I can't help you with James life prior to him getting into trouble but I can tell you that my children are descendants of John Smith alias James Sidebottom. John Smith had one child a lot later than the other children, his son was Alfred Sydney Smith and he was born 10 years after the next youngest child. Alfred Sydney Smith was a bit of a wild child and was also disinherited when John Smith died. An interesting thing to do given John Smiths career.
I have mostly family accounts to thank for news of Alfred being disinherited so I will need to confirm that for sure. However, I am happy to help you with any information I have. It seems you may well have more than I do though.
Cheers

Pages: [1]