Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - markbridge

Pages: [1]
1
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: The Times wants your views: DNA ethnicity results
« on: Wednesday 03 February 16 17:09 GMT (UK)  »
Many thanks to everybody who has replied so far - fascinating comments and some great pointers for my article. I will respond individually to those who have sent private messages.

To give those who haven't taken the tests an idea of what ethnicity results look like I'm posting my results from Ancestry and Family Tree DNA, with a summary of my known family history.

Paper-trail family history:

50% Anglo-Irish - mix of families of English, Scottish, Welsh and Irish origin
31.25% English
12.5% German - from Thuringia, Eastern Germany
6.25% Jewish - mix of Sephardi and Ashkenazi lines

AncestryDNA:

38% Great Britain
20% Ireland
18% Scandinavia
11% Iberian Peninsula
 
(trace regions)

5% Italy/Greece
4% European Jewish
2% Europe East
1% Finland/Northwest Russia
<1% Europe West

Family Tree DNA:

39% British Isles
25% Western and Central Europe
18% Southern Europe
13% Eastern Europe
5% Scandinavia

Timeframe:

Ancestry says: "AncestryDNA can reach back hundreds, maybe even a thousand years"

Family Tree DNA says: "myOrigins results are your personal genetic ancestry that reflects the last 100 to 2,000 years"

Cousin matching:

Both sites list lots of people who are probably my distant cousins. In a few cases, I've been able to spot the relationship, so the DNA confirms the paper-trail.

Answering a couple of points:

Re Trystan's question, the companies compare customers' DNA results to samples from modern reference populations, rather than samples of ancient DNA.

On Steve's point, we would pay for people who have already had the AncestryDNA test to transfer their results to Family Tree DNA for comparison. It's for people who are willing to share their ethnicity results with us on an anonymous basis as described in my first post. We wouldn't want to see, handle or claim ownership of their raw data.

2
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / The Times wants your views: DNA ethnicity results
« on: Tuesday 02 February 16 16:09 GMT (UK)  »
I'm a journalist at The Times and am working on an article on autosomal DNA tests. Among other things, this will look at the value/accuracy of "ethnicity" results. We're keen to hear from people in the UK who have taken the AncestryDNA test who would be willing to share their results and their thoughts on them (anonymously, if preferred).

If you have also been tested with Family Tree DNA or 23andMe, or have uploaded your Ancestry raw data to the latter site, we would be keen to know how your ethnicity results with those companies compare.

If you would be willing to help, please message me or post your thoughts below, including your ethnicity results, with trace regions, and a brief summary of your known family history (e.g. seven great-grandparents born in England, one in Ireland, all known lines English and Irish).

We won't name you or provide any identifying information in our article unless you state that you're happy to be named.

If you haven't yet transferred your Ancestry raw data to Family Tree DNA and paid the $39 fee to "unlock" features like myOrigins (ethnicity results) but would be keen to do so, please let me know as we will be able to pay for eight people to do this. Explain why you'd like to compare results and we'll pay for transfer upgrades for the members who provide the best and most interesting reasons.

Many thanks, and I look forward to hearing from you.

Mark Bridge

Pages: [1]