1
Europe / Re: ITALIAN RESEARCH
« on: Tuesday 24 January 17 19:24 GMT (UK) »
Thanks very much Steve. I'll wait to hear more. Cheers, Greg
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
<snip>
If not I would be looking for work house admission registers.
<snip>
The BEDFORD group in 1901 does indeed look promising.
The person you've identified as Rich is female (see the column in which her name appears) and "married", and I think the name actually says "Riah".
So is this Maria, in disguise, with her new man Tom Bedford, pretending to be his wife?
I was wondering if I might be able to find the children Alice and Thomas in the 1901 census, under a different surname (because informally adopted, or with their father???), and found a few possibilities. I searched for Alice born in Walsall aged under 1 year, and these had a Thomas as well; some had extra children too:
RG13/2702 fo9 p9 - as BEDFORD (in a lodging house) - also Teddy aged 8
RG13/2702 fo94 p1 - as SHERMAN
RG13/2704 fo68 p6 - as TIPPER - also Samuel C aged 6 and Florence L aged 5
I haven't investigated birth registrations or the couples' marriages and mothers' maiden names (in case they were aunts etc), but could any of these fit? And if so, might the 1903 child have been given the same surname?
Arthur
Was there anyone left to look after the children while she was in the asylum?
If not I would be looking for work house admission registers.
The new born baby should be listed with its siblings on admission.