Show Posts
1
Kent / Re: Joy/Botting/King/Martin Family of Brenchley
« on: Sunday 15 June 14 14:01 BST (UK) »
Hi Barbara
I'm still a bit new to working at this level (before 1837). I am using ancestry.com.au and my Goodman family tree is a public member tree. My dates info has come from other public member trees. Initially, I got very excited when I found Brenchley, which to me is like a fossil cave of ancestors; just amazing. I have taken facts from other member trees and the combined ancestry tree (I haven't got the name quite right there). I am now trying to firm up the roof of my fossil cave mine (I love analogies) with sources, working back from firm facts that I can confirm. Tonight (in Alice Springs, where I live) I have joined the Kent Family History Society and I plan to order their Cd 34 which has the Brenchley records in it.
For me, the Joy family marries into the Kings, and thence later to the Cuddingtons in Barming in about 1800.
I am coming to Kent next week and hope to do some actual fieldwork.
Regards
Graham
I'm still a bit new to working at this level (before 1837). I am using ancestry.com.au and my Goodman family tree is a public member tree. My dates info has come from other public member trees. Initially, I got very excited when I found Brenchley, which to me is like a fossil cave of ancestors; just amazing. I have taken facts from other member trees and the combined ancestry tree (I haven't got the name quite right there). I am now trying to firm up the roof of my fossil cave mine (I love analogies) with sources, working back from firm facts that I can confirm. Tonight (in Alice Springs, where I live) I have joined the Kent Family History Society and I plan to order their Cd 34 which has the Brenchley records in it.
For me, the Joy family marries into the Kings, and thence later to the Cuddingtons in Barming in about 1800.
I am coming to Kent next week and hope to do some actual fieldwork.
Regards
Graham