3
« on: Tuesday 09 September 25 14:59 BST (UK) »
Thanks Trish
Amanda doesn't actually name James as her father when she married. She dropped the forename Amanda on most records (only her birth, baptism, death and burial use Amanda and her marriage and all census entries she goes by Elizabeth). While she gets called Mawby and referenced as James's daughter on the censuses, when she married Joseph Carter she married as Bishop not Mawby and no father's details are on the marriage certificate.
While my husband shares DNA matches with some people who have Mawby on their trees, it isn't conclusive as it could potentially relate to other lines further back in Gilmorton where that Mawby line centres during the 1800s and 1700s as my husband has other links to families in Gilmorton. Plus a potential line regarding Amanda Elizabeth's Bishop line in Gilmorton married a Mawby. Without some really definitive matches linked to closer relations of James Mawby, it is hard to say for sure. But it is interesting for her to have been brought up by James as Mawby but decide not to use his name/details as her father when she married. James Mawby and her mother Ann are the witnesses to the marriage too, which again you'd think maybe they would have encouraged her to give James as her father.
One day it might be solved with more DNA connections!
Thanks
Alex