RootsChat.Com

I've since broken through this brickwall.  It turns out Henry Morrey who witnessed my ancestor's marriage was Henry Morrey (1785-1814) of Sandbach.  I've compared his signature on my ancestor's marriage record to that of his own marriage record to Esther Simcoe.  They are a definite match.

That said, I'm curious about the possible connection to Humphrey Morrey.  My Morrey ancestors were Quakers for generations in Cheshire County.  Humphrey Morrey was also a Quaker, so I wondered if there was a connection or it was just coincidence.  What leads you to connect Humphrey to those records in Cheshire?

I understand that the annotation "Parents not in Unity" on a Quaker birth record can mean the parents were disowned from the congregation for having (1) married outside the Quaker faith or (2) having a child out of wedlock.  Such an annotation appears on the birth record of a man I suspect is the younger brother of my ancestor.  No known birth record for my ancestor exists.  My theory is that my ancestor's birth was in fact the reason the parents were disowned.  Do records of disownment still exist, and if so, and where might I go to find them?  This would have occurred in the Nantwich or Sandbach quaker congregations in about 1783.

There is a Henry Morrey
https://familysearch.org/pal:/MM9.1.1/NV2R-JP1

Heather

That is interesting.  I've never noticed that before.  I went to the Family History Library in Salt Lake City today and looked up the original record that was extracted from.  It is from a Quaker congregation that met quarterly in Nantwich.  The Henry (and his parents John and Sarah) mentioned is from Middlewich.  His siblings Ann, Sarah, and Mary also appear in those records.  All of those are common forenames in the families of my known Morrey ancestors.  Also, the Morrey family had some history of non-conformism.  That's certainly a possibility!  I wonder if that Quaker congregation has additional records that aren't publicly available...