Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jomot

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 423
1
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Subscription to Ancestry ?
« on: Sunday 27 April 25 00:52 BST (UK)  »
Let your sub lapse and then renew again using the link

2
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Subscription to Ancestry ?
« on: Wednesday 23 April 25 00:52 BST (UK)  »
I hope Biggles doesn't mind me answering instead.

The offer is recently mentioned / linked at post #407:

https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=832955.405

3
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Tuesday 15 April 25 15:40 BST (UK)  »
As it says in the "Searching the Index ... Limitations" section about the Colonial Secretary's Letters "The index is not a complete list of all material within the series NRS 905". Perhaps an email to the NSW Archives might help? Looks like you need Reel 2934 Item (5/2400) .
https://mhnsw.au/articles/922/

The reel you mention is just an Index to the register of letters received, ie it gives a surname or subject and then the reference number, nothing more.  You then need to go to the actual register of letters received to get more details, which I've already done - 44/2540 was dated 28 Mar 1844 from the Royal Engineers, ie Appl[ication]n from Lt Hamilton RE Norfolk Island for use of Govern[men]t House

I've been through the Index for the letter M, Jan-Jun 1844, and there's nothing at all for Mackley or anything similar.

I also looked up 44/2546 in case it was bad handwriting, but this relates to John McCurdy of Penrith regarding his wife Sophia, and is dated 26 Mar 1844.

I think you could be right though and that an email to the archives may be needed.

Thanks also to Christine for the Cecil Hills info - I'd done a little bit of searching but had planned to come back to it, so hopefully the database will be up and running again by then  ;D

4
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Tuesday 15 April 25 04:18 BST (UK)  »
I agree, I think its something to do with those records, but what? 

The details I posted about the Royal Engineers are from the Colonial Secretary's Letters (Register of Letters Received) but that particular letter doesn't seem to have anything to do with John Mackley, either by name or otherwise.

I suppose I was hoping some wise, wonderful person knew their way around the various records and could magic something up, but alas no  :'(

In the absence of anything definitive in Australia I think I'm going to have to go back to the records in England and see if I can find anything new there instead.  My gut tells me its him, but I just need to prove it!

5
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Tuesday 15 April 25 02:55 BST (UK)  »
There was another convict John Mackley, came out on the David Clarke in 1841, so that 1844 letter may be his:

I did consider that and then dismissed it as the annotation seemed very specific to the Earl Spencer, but having looked again there's something in the Hobart Town Gazette, 1844 (I'll have to dig around for a more specific date) saying:

John Mackley, David Clarke, to ditto (to Allan M'Kinnon, Dalness)

But then what has 1838 got to do with anything if this man only arrived in 1841?

The reference 44/2540 in the register of letters received was dated 28 Mar 1844 from the Royal Engineers and says (I think!): Appl[ication]n from Lt Hamilton RE Norfolk Island for use of Govern[men]t House, so doesn't seem to connect to either man!

No 44/2540 dated 6 Mar 1844 has to refer to something, but what?  And where?

6
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Tuesday 15 April 25 02:21 BST (UK)  »
According to the newspapers Peter Bramley was convicted at the same sessions for stealing watches and other items from his father's shop at Market Harborough.  He was just 17 and initially sentenced to death.

John was convicted of stealing money at Saxelbye, so the two weren't connected.

7
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Monday 14 April 25 12:31 BST (UK)  »
Another dead end then by the look of it.

I've been trying to figure out that reference to the letter - 44/2540 dated 6 Mar 1844 and it seems to be referenced here under Reel 2537 then either item 2401 or 2403

https://mhnsw.au/articles/922/#Indexes-1826-1906

I've looked on Ancestry on the Register of Letters Received 1843-1845 and there is an entry numbered 44/2540 (image 233), but its nothing to do with John Mackley and not dated 6 March 1844, so I'm more confused than ever  ???




8
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Monday 14 April 25 02:15 BST (UK)  »
I've just spotted a record I didn't see earlier, which is an 1805 acquittal at Leicester Assizes for John Mackley charged with larceny from the person.

Any further information about that might be handy too.

9
Australia / Re: Convict John Mackley arrived 1813
« on: Monday 14 April 25 02:02 BST (UK)  »
Ooh now that's interesting.  He did have a son named John who became an ag lab, but I'm not aware of one named William so I'll look into that. 

Ann, his wife, died just a few months after he was imprisoned so I've also been looking for any records relating to the children in this period, but so far I haven't found anything.

EDIT: Just seen your edit.  Oh well!

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 423