RootsChat.Com

I think it might be worth adding that no 2 computers are the same when it comes to reproducing colour. Over the years I have colourised many photographs and compared them on different computers. Sometimes the variable is subtle - an increase in tone or contrast values but elsewhere I have seen both earth colours and flesh tones appear blue.

My tree was set to private the moment I begun it because I knew that many of my cousins would not like their ancestry in the public domain. Unfortunately, there are several sites on the web about my family which reveal personal details that I find uncomfortable - I hasten to add that there is no one in my ancestry to be ashamed of,  and much of the information is readily available in the newspapers or documented on TV but  I fail to see the need for others to parade them quite so publicly, especially when said sites reveal the living. Fortunately, my own branch has remained off the radar, and fingers-crossed, they remain so.

The password for a private tree could be included in a will or tree could be downloaded as a gedcom file and transferred to a flash drive and given to a relative.

I do, however, understand those who choose to have public trees.

NB Dinah was the sole executrix of Nathaniel's will. Jacob Nathan and David and Henry Moses were the witnesses

Thank you for pointing that out. I need a new pair of specs! I am, however, fairly confident, for several reasons, this couple belong to my tree.

Many thanks for everyone's help.

thanks guys, it's what I thought but it does not look like a 'D'. 

I just found this topic. Amazing story. I am not related directly to this Marks branch, although many of their cousins are my cousins, and Anthony's wife and children are my blood cousins.
Dom1