1
Yorkshire (East Riding & York) / Re: Elizabeth Waites (1823 – 1902) Unwed mother, inmate of what Huggate institution?
« on: Thursday 24 July 25 10:58 BST (UK) »
Thanks MollyC for your correction.
Thanks ShaunJ. I see what you mean about lots of "Inmates" in Huggate marriage records. On the half a dozen pages that I looked at about half were "servant" and the other half "inmate". So your suggestion that the archaic meaning is being used here makes sense. I found a website which gave the archaic meaning and then said: By the 1830s, inmate had come to mean "one confined to an institution." It's not hard to imagine that the Huggate curate was still using the archaic meaning in the 1840s. Elizabeth had been working as a servant for the Huggate miller (1841 census) and presumably she had to stop work and return to the family home when she became pregnant.
Just goes to show that you shouldn't jump to conclusions. Thanks again to all.
Thanks ShaunJ. I see what you mean about lots of "Inmates" in Huggate marriage records. On the half a dozen pages that I looked at about half were "servant" and the other half "inmate". So your suggestion that the archaic meaning is being used here makes sense. I found a website which gave the archaic meaning and then said: By the 1830s, inmate had come to mean "one confined to an institution." It's not hard to imagine that the Huggate curate was still using the archaic meaning in the 1840s. Elizabeth had been working as a servant for the Huggate miller (1841 census) and presumably she had to stop work and return to the family home when she became pregnant.
Just goes to show that you shouldn't jump to conclusions. Thanks again to all.