Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - familydar

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 125
1
Sussex / Re: James Terry. B1849 in Brightling, Sussex. GRO birth record.
« on: Monday 16 February 26 14:09 GMT (UK)  »
Can you confirm please that the census sightings you have match these?  Just in case I'm chasing after the wrong man!
1881 RG11/1049 fol 58 (age 35)
1891 RG12/0781 fol 51 (age 42)
1901 RG13/0753 fol 86 (age 52)

Since birthplace is consistent, I'd be trying to identify his bap.  Brightling PRs are on Ancestry https://www.ancestry.co.uk/search/collections/62125/, whilst he's not indexed under any obvious variant he may be badly mistranscribed, or his mother subsequently married a TERRY.  A long job that will involve a trawl for (I'd suggest) quite a few years either side of 1849, try to account for each and every James going forward.  How much time you dedicate to it will depend on how desperately you want to know who his mother was.

Regarding supposed father Thomas TERRY, the name may have been a complete fabrication or James's mother may have told him his deceased father's name was Thomas.  He may even have been a carpenter.  However although young James had presumably been brought up as a TERRY that doesn't necessarily mean that was his father's surname too.  Have you managed to identify the witnesses to the 1888 marriage?

In all three censuses where he's been found, he admits to being significantly older than his wife.  I'd be inclined to think he may have been older still, and that could put the Arundel Thomas back in the frame.  If I'm looking at the correct census pages, who is William age 7 in 1881/17 in 1891?  Might there be another marriage prior to 1876?

Have fun
Jane :-)

2
The Common Room / Re: Mystery beneficiary in will
« on: Wednesday 11 February 26 14:33 GMT (UK)  »
Maybe he'd drawn up the Will in his own time and the bequest was his payment.

Jane :-)

3
The Common Room / Re: Arthur Gilliland, where did he go ?
« on: Monday 02 February 26 13:54 GMT (UK)  »
Presumably you've tried searching the 1939 register with just DoB and no name, he may be badly mistranscribed or using a false name that bears some relationship to his true name.  I'd expect there to be may be a few hundred to work through but you could pick off the ones local to Blackpool (last sighting) first.

Jane :-)

4
The Common Room / Re: Recent Change to Ancestry Layout
« on: Wednesday 14 January 26 14:23 GMT (UK)  »
I've sent some feedback.  I don't expect anything positive to come out of it but you have to live in hope!

Jane :-)

5
The Common Room / Re: Recent Change to Ancestry Layout
« on: Wednesday 14 January 26 14:04 GMT (UK)  »
Something else - if the record had previously been saved to someone in your own tree it told you so near the top of the record, who and which tree.  Now it's at the bottom (more scrolling) and you have to click the "1 person 1 tree" link to get any more info.

Jane :-)

6
The Common Room / Recent Change to Ancestry Layout
« on: Wednesday 14 January 26 13:49 GMT (UK)  »
I've just been given a new Ancestry layout.  Do any search, select any record and if there's an image you see just the very top of it (page number for instance) at the top of the screen with a button far right to view the image.  The record detail is below and has much bigger gaps between the lines than previously.  If more than half a dozen lines or so (as for a census) you have to scroll down to see it all, then scroll back to view the image.  Perhaps it looks good on a phone or tablet in portrait view, but it's horrible on a wide screen desktop monitor.  No warning about it and no option to switch back to the old layout.  Progess I suppose.

Jane :-)

7
The Common Room / Re: Probate Orders (the last minute ones)
« on: Sunday 11 January 26 12:08 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for reminding me, my last one arrived a couple of days ago and I completely forgot to download it after reading the notification email!  So if it's any consolation they are still trickling through.

Jane :-)

8
The Common Room / Re: Has anyone tried YourRoots.com from Genomelink
« on: Saturday 03 January 26 15:09 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks Zaph

Jane :-)

9
The Common Room / Re: Has anyone tried YourRoots.com from Genomelink
« on: Saturday 03 January 26 14:27 GMT (UK)  »
Zaph, since you said you had a few previously unknown matches I decided to give this site a try.

I've had the email telling me "Your Ancestry, DNA Match, and Traits are ready".  I was surprised that the email suggested it was pretty instant when other sites which accept uploads say anything between a day and a week.  However when I login it tells me my matches are still processing.  Blundering around the site trying other features isn't inspiring confidence, for instance the DNA Match demo asks me whether I'm sure I want to delete my GEDCOM when I click the TRY DEMO button. 

How long did your upload take to find matches?  Do you find the site a bit flaky?  And a bit heavy on the upselling front? 

Jane :-)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 125