Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - familydar

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 122
1
Romilly, hold off taking the sample and sending it back till MH confirm tests will get the new processing, probably after Xmas.  In a recent LostCousins newsletter https://www.lostcousins.com/newsletters2/lateoct25news.htm, Peter Calver suggested that it's pot luck at the moment.

Not heard back from GEDMatch yet.

Jane :-)

2
I've just submitted a ticket to GEDMatch to find out whether they will be able to process these.  Don't suppose anybody already knows?  I have old results on MH (uploaded ages ago, not one of their tests) and in general it's not been terribly useful, but for the sake of £29 and future-proofing I'm thinking of giving it a try.

Jane :-)

3
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Triangulation conundrum
« on: Sunday 09 November 25 12:51 GMT (UK)  »
Are you certain they triangulate on the same segments?  If you're looking at Ancestry, where (unless things have changed) you have no way of knowing which position(s) on which chromosome(s), it's entirely possible that you share 3 segs with CD and 6 segs with SW, but that CD and SW share completely different segments with each other.  They have a common ancestor but not necessarily the one that either of them shares with you.

Jane :-)

4
If the funeral was at Ilford cemetery I'd expect him to be planted there.  I believe Essex Archives hold church records but I'm not sure about cemetery records (assuming Ilford cemetery was a dedicated cemetery and not a churchyard).

He may have had family at Ilford, but if not he may have been buried there because anything more local was full up.

Jane :-)

5
Somerset / Re: Clerical error in marriage register?
« on: Monday 13 October 25 08:14 BST (UK)  »
Given her calculated age at marriage, could she have been a widow?  With either Bath or White being her maiden name and the other her married?  Or she had perhaps cohabited with a Mr Bath or Mr White and he had died?  Or she was illegitimate and her mother later married?  Or mother widowed and married again so children known by both surnames?  Lots to throw into the mix, not sure if any is helpful though!

Jane :-)

6
Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition / Re: 1901 census query
« on: Saturday 11 October 25 15:31 BST (UK)  »
It relates to the row above, under 1 mos (months), so no help to you whatsoever  :-\

Jane :-)

7
Berkshire / Re: Agnes or Anne Pinnill married in 1633 Stanford in the Vale
« on: Sunday 28 September 25 08:50 BST (UK)  »
I googled "Ann and Agnes same name?" and  a summary of the AI generated answer was that the names were often used interchangeably.  Agnes used to be pronounced annis or anes (silent g).  I had wondered, I get things wrong so often these days it's good to have suspicions confirmed!

Jane :-)

8
Leitrim / Re: NLI Baptism register - reading closely
« on: Friday 26 September 25 17:45 BST (UK)  »
I'd interpret the "settled" reference as being to do with abode rather than accounts, as in the individual had come to live in the parish rather than passing through.

Jane :-)

9
Ancestral Family Tree DNA Testing / Re: Ancestry Managment.
« on: Friday 12 September 25 14:52 BST (UK)  »
Is it possible you were signed in to the old Ancestry account and not to your preferred one when you clicked the link?  Perhaps you use one browser for your primary Ancestry research but a different one for your email, and your old Ancestry account was still signed in on the same browser as you use for your email?  By browser I mean Edge, Firefox, Chrome etc.  I'd suggest you make sure you're logged out of any "spare" Ancestry accounts and ask for the invite to be sent again.

Jane :-)

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 122