1
Cornwall / Re: Menny Billy Cornwall ??? Birth location clarification
« on: Thursday 24 February 22 05:14 GMT (UK) »
Thanks very much for your help everyone! Menabilly fits in perfect!
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Cornwall / Re: Menny Billy Cornwall ??? Birth location clarification
« on: Wednesday 23 February 22 17:24 GMT (UK) »
Thanks very much to both for your help! Much appreciated.
3
Cornwall / Menny Billy Cornwall ??? Birth location clarification
« on: Wednesday 23 February 22 16:51 GMT (UK) »
Hello! I am hoping someone can help me with the correct place of birth for Charles Mutton in the 1881 England Census. Both Ancestry and FamilySearch have transcribed it as “Menny Billy” ?
https:// www. familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27P-FX5Y
(I’m not sure if links are permitted so I’ve put spaces)
1881 England Census for Samuel Mutton
Lancashire, Manchester, St George, District 21
It’s the 6th entry from the bottom.
His birth was registered in 1863 St Austell, Cornwall.
Thank you
https:// www. familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q27P-FX5Y
(I’m not sure if links are permitted so I’ve put spaces)
1881 England Census for Samuel Mutton
Lancashire, Manchester, St George, District 21
It’s the 6th entry from the bottom.
His birth was registered in 1863 St Austell, Cornwall.
Thank you
4
Dublin / Re: Cemeteries near Lime Street
« on: Thursday 22 July 21 17:13 BST (UK) »
Thanks very much Dublin1850! I’ve not worked on my Archbold branch for at least 8 years. I’m so grateful for the irishgenealogy civil and church records site. Combining those records with the censuses is extremely helpful. Enjoy your day 
5
Dublin / Re: Cemeteries near Lime Street
« on: Wednesday 21 July 21 19:04 BST (UK) »
eadaoin, Thank you for the tip! I will be sure to check it out!
6
Dublin / Re: Cemeteries near Lime Street
« on: Wednesday 21 July 21 16:54 BST (UK) »
Dublin1850, Thank you very much for your info. Yes, that is them. Seaview Avenue
I descend from Elizabeth Archbold-Coyne’s older sister Margaret Archbold-Gregory. I’m building out our tree by connecting DNA cousins. I’m very thankful for the Irishgenealogy .ie site. It’s so much easier now that the Civil records are available online. Putting the pieces of this family puzzle together.
I descend from Elizabeth Archbold-Coyne’s older sister Margaret Archbold-Gregory. I’m building out our tree by connecting DNA cousins. I’m very thankful for the Irishgenealogy .ie site. It’s so much easier now that the Civil records are available online. Putting the pieces of this family puzzle together.
7
Dublin / Re: Cemeteries near Lime Street
« on: Tuesday 20 July 21 17:03 BST (UK) »
Thanks to all for your very helpful replies. The link from athacliath62 for the Dublin burials, graveyards and maps of where they are will be very helpful in my research!
I was able to find quite a few buried in Clontarf
CASTLE AVENUE (SAINT JOHN THE BAPTIST)
ADDRESS: Clontarf, Dublin 3 (adjacent to Clontarf Castle)
I did check Glasnevin without success but will continue checking around.
dublin1850, very late 19th to 20th Centuries for now and they were RC.
I was able to find quite a few buried in Clontarf
CASTLE AVENUE (SAINT JOHN THE BAPTIST)
ADDRESS: Clontarf, Dublin 3 (adjacent to Clontarf Castle)
I did check Glasnevin without success but will continue checking around.
dublin1850, very late 19th to 20th Centuries for now and they were RC.
8
Dublin / Cemeteries near Lime Street
« on: Monday 19 July 21 22:31 BST (UK) »
Hello! I’m wondering if anyone would know where people living at 11 Lime Street would have been buried? My Coyne ancestors lived at that address for many decades. Thank you
9
Nottinghamshire Lookup Requests / Re: Ernest Ambrose MIDDLETON lookup help please
« on: Thursday 28 May 20 04:00 BST (UK) »
.. continued
“MR. BARLOW AND THE WITNESS.
“There was no mystery made about the identity of the next witness — Mrs. Clara Ludbrooke, widow and letter of apartments, of 66. Sherwood-street. Mrs. Ludbrooke said that when the girl became ill she went to a person whom she thought was Sinclair's insurance doctor in Wollaton-street. He told her his name, but she could not remember it.
“Asked if she could see the man court, witness looked at the magistrates, at the solicitors' bench, at Press box — in fact, everywhere but at the dock. She said she had not brought her glasses with her, and refused Mr. Barlow's offer to try his. She was no more successful when told to take a walk round the court, and when sent up to the Bench to take a view of the court from that vantage point, she still professed inability to find him, although she pointed out two or three dark-haired people as "like him."
“Mr. Barlow thereupon declared that the woman was not in fit condition to give evidence. He would withdraw her evidence that day.
“Invited by the magistrates' clerk to give his grounds for the step, Mr. Barlow declared: "I think she is the worse for drink."
“Detective-superintendent Atherton said that over the premises in Sherwood-street were the signs: “Dr. de Boi. consulting rooms," "Dr. de Boi Company, surgical appliances," and “Dr. de Boi Company, medical specialists." When charged that day with wilful murder Middleton made no reply.
“The charge being read over again, Middleton, in a firm voice, pleaded "Not guilty."
“Mr. Young urged that the state of affairs was consistent with something that was perfectly natural. It might or might not be consistent with something that was unlawful, but that there ever was anything unlawful the Bench had not one scrap of evidence except such as they might glean from the statement made by the woman when dying. It was a question which would necessarily operate with a jury to now far such a person could fully appreciate and understand the gravity of her remarks. His comment on the prisoner's questions at the taking of the depositions was that whatever else his client might be, he was not likely to compete successfully with Mr. Barlow and himself as a cross-examiner. Mr. Young mentioned that he had been called into the case at the eleventh hour, and that counsel previously retained for his defence had been prevented by a prior engagement from appearing. It was not of so much importance to the defence what happened that day, seeing that Middleton was already committed to the Assizes on the coroner's warrant, but at the same time the case was one of great weakness so far as direct evidence was concerned.
“Mr. Baggaley said Middleton would be committed to the Assizes.
“On the other charges the accused was remanded.”
'Nottingham Evening Post', 25th February 1916.
“MR. BARLOW AND THE WITNESS.
“There was no mystery made about the identity of the next witness — Mrs. Clara Ludbrooke, widow and letter of apartments, of 66. Sherwood-street. Mrs. Ludbrooke said that when the girl became ill she went to a person whom she thought was Sinclair's insurance doctor in Wollaton-street. He told her his name, but she could not remember it.
“Asked if she could see the man court, witness looked at the magistrates, at the solicitors' bench, at Press box — in fact, everywhere but at the dock. She said she had not brought her glasses with her, and refused Mr. Barlow's offer to try his. She was no more successful when told to take a walk round the court, and when sent up to the Bench to take a view of the court from that vantage point, she still professed inability to find him, although she pointed out two or three dark-haired people as "like him."
“Mr. Barlow thereupon declared that the woman was not in fit condition to give evidence. He would withdraw her evidence that day.
“Invited by the magistrates' clerk to give his grounds for the step, Mr. Barlow declared: "I think she is the worse for drink."
“Detective-superintendent Atherton said that over the premises in Sherwood-street were the signs: “Dr. de Boi. consulting rooms," "Dr. de Boi Company, surgical appliances," and “Dr. de Boi Company, medical specialists." When charged that day with wilful murder Middleton made no reply.
“The charge being read over again, Middleton, in a firm voice, pleaded "Not guilty."
“Mr. Young urged that the state of affairs was consistent with something that was perfectly natural. It might or might not be consistent with something that was unlawful, but that there ever was anything unlawful the Bench had not one scrap of evidence except such as they might glean from the statement made by the woman when dying. It was a question which would necessarily operate with a jury to now far such a person could fully appreciate and understand the gravity of her remarks. His comment on the prisoner's questions at the taking of the depositions was that whatever else his client might be, he was not likely to compete successfully with Mr. Barlow and himself as a cross-examiner. Mr. Young mentioned that he had been called into the case at the eleventh hour, and that counsel previously retained for his defence had been prevented by a prior engagement from appearing. It was not of so much importance to the defence what happened that day, seeing that Middleton was already committed to the Assizes on the coroner's warrant, but at the same time the case was one of great weakness so far as direct evidence was concerned.
“Mr. Baggaley said Middleton would be committed to the Assizes.
“On the other charges the accused was remanded.”
'Nottingham Evening Post', 25th February 1916.