Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - robang66

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 36
1
England / Re: Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Wednesday 07 January 26 21:18 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks to everyone who helped me with this research. 

2
England / Re: Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Tuesday 30 December 25 16:55 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks so much for your help and patience.

3
England / Re: Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Tuesday 30 December 25 16:44 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks for that.
So, do I have this correct now?  Betsy Jane's mother, nee Uttridge, must have been married to Quarmby, and perhaps later on, to William Ashton.  Betsy Jane took the name of Ashton, and when she married Albert Cook, it was registered as Betsy Jane Ashton.  Subsequently, 30 years later, the Vicar made the notation on the certificate, entering the name of Quarmby.  The name, Ashton, on the document was not actually changed  -  it was a notation written in the corner of the document. 

I feel I'm spinning my wheels on this, and I still don't know why my previous posting has been labelled as SPAM. 

4
England / Re: Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Tuesday 30 December 25 16:26 GMT (UK)  »
QUARMBY, BETSY  JANE      mmn UTTRIDGE     
GRO Reference: 1880  M Quarter in BRADFORD YORKSHIRE  Volume 09B  Page 104

Thanks for this additional information but I'm not sure what I'm looking at.   Sorry, but could you please explain what "mmn UTTRIDGE" means?
Robyn

5
England / Re: Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Tuesday 30 December 25 15:57 GMT (UK)  »
]Thanks for your response.  The marriage was in 1901 and names recorded on the marriage certificate were Albert Cook and Betsy Jane Ashton.  Witnesses were William Edward Ashton and Maggie Boag.   It appears that nothing on the document  has been changed, except for the addition of the notation in the bottom left corner,  Her father's name is Ashton.  I cannot see where Quarmby comes into it.  I tried to attach a copy of the certificate but it would not go through.  So, this is the complete notation  - In entry 404 col 2 for 'Ashton' read 'Quarmby otherwise Ashton and in Col 7 for 'Ashton' read 'Quarmby'.  Corrected on the eighteenth day of April 1931by me G.C. Weaver, Vicar, in the presence of Albert Cook and Betsy Jane Cook, the parties married. 

If her father's name is Ashton Any help will be appreciated. 

6
England / Ashton or Quarmby
« on: Tuesday 23 December 25 20:23 GMT (UK)  »
I have found a marriage certificate for my gguncle in Sheffield.  In the bottom left corner of the certificate it says, in part, "Col. 2 for "Ashton" and in Col. 7 for "Ashton" read "Quarmby".  Corrected on the 18th day of April 1931 by me, G.C. Weaver, Vicar.
Where exactly does "Quarmby" enter the picture and for what meaning?  Nowhere else, in all the subsequent recordings, does the name "Quarmby" appear.
Any help will be appreciated. 

7
Australia / Re: WHERE "THE HECK" ARE THE HAGUES
« on: Saturday 18 January 25 14:31 GMT (UK)  »
Thanks to everyone who helped me with this name.  I appreciate it. 

8
Australia / Re: WHERE "THE HECK" ARE THE HAGUES
« on: Friday 17 January 25 17:17 GMT (UK)  »
The obituary for Annie's mother, Agnes Jane, lists two daughters, one being Mrs. F.G. Harris  (G could be a typo), living in Brisbane.  Very possibly, this is Annie married to Frederick Charles Harris. 
The Henry Walker Harris is then very possibly married to another Annie, and they are both buried at Belgian Gardens.  This is worth researching, for sure.

9
Australia / WHERE "THE HECK" ARE THE HAGUES
« on: Friday 17 January 25 16:27 GMT (UK)  »
Morning:   My 1st cousin 2 rem. is ANNIE HAGUE, daughter of Harry Frost Hague and Agnes Jane Cooper.  Annie was born in Queensland on  11 July 1894  .  I then have an Annie Hague married to EITHER Henry Walker Harris  or  Frederick Charles Harris.  Henry is buried with Annie at Belgian Gardens Cemetery, Townsville, Section A4, Row 8, Mem.ID 185873920.  My confusion comes in that while some trees are recording Frederick to be her husband, same dates, I can find no proof that he is not.  I know I should not believe other trees, but before I add Henry, I need to be able to rule out Frederick definitely.  I have tried to enter Queensland BMD records this morning, but am not able.

So... could anyone please help me confirm that Frederick is out of the picture and that Henry is correct?  I would truly appreciate any direction that would help.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 36