Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Rmcl

Pages: [1]
1
Stirlingshire / Re: Andrew MCLUCKIE (Kippen) 1740
« on: Saturday 09 June 12 04:48 BST (UK)  »
Pauline

Thanks for the welcome.  I'm new to genealogy.

In 1851 census, James (76) (widower) was living in rural Huntington Twp, Hastings County, Ontario, Canada.  (Just west of the current hamlet of Ivanhoe).   He was shown as a farmer....but I presume anyone living on a farm was considered a farmer. 

The 1851 census shows his son, James Jr (26) is on the farm next door.  Also his daughters (Jean (Jane) (25)  and Janet (Jannet) (23) appear to have married brothers (Harvey's) and living on the farm on the opposite side to their father.   

In 1851 Jame's son William was also in Hastings County working as a laborer.

Census shows children born in Canada were John (15) and Chistiannah (Christie Ann) (13).  (Note John's tombstone would indicate he was born in 1838 ...died 1860 at 21 years 10 months but I am convinced it is accurate). 

Members of Janet Archibald's family are also in Hastings County in 1851 nearby.  (within a few kilometres)

Lastly, John, Jane (and husband), Janet (and husband) are buried in the Archibald family cemetery (head stones clearly visible) in Hastings County.  I speculate/think Janet Archibald (and if so, I presume James Sr) is also buried there but the head stone has become illegible.  I hope some day to be able to prove this.

I hope this helps.   

 

2
Stirlingshire / Re: Andrew MCLUCKIE (Kippen) 1740
« on: Tuesday 05 June 12 03:54 BST (UK)  »
Hi all

As Nora has indicated, James McLuckie and Janet Archibald came to Hastings County Ontario Canada.   (They were married in 1822, James was reported as 76 in the 1851 census in Canada.   So I have it that  James was 46 to 47 ish when he got married.  Janet was 24. (based on secondary material))   

I have long wondered that given James was getting married so late in life, if this was his second marriage.

When I looked at potential matches, from Mr. Blair's web page/database (that has been a great help to me...thank you!) I offer the best fit is James having married Christina Graham in 1803.   I see children from a James McLuckie/Christina Graham  marriage from 1804 to 1818.  Which would support a second marriage in 1822 to Janet Archibald.

Lastly, given the 1851 Canadian census report of James being 76, I have also thought that the best match (from Mr. Blair's data base) for the birth of James was Nov 1774   (parents Andrew McLuckie and Jean Buchanan)

Except for the arrival of James Mc and Janet A in Ontario Canada....the rest of the connection is supposition....but it seems to fit.

I welcome your collective thoughts

Pages: [1]