Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - bulky

Pages: [1]
1
Warwickshire / Re: Frederick Deeming - Notorious murderer
« on: Thursday 29 March 12 19:24 BST (UK)  »
On 3rd February 1895, Thomas Edward Deeming, a seaman, son of Edward Deeming, an engineer, married Alice Mary Martin in Southwark.

Assuming that he is the same person, he hasn't changed his name at that time.

I can't find Thomas on the later censuses but Alice is visiting a James Brent in Camberwell in 1901, the area where Edward is living.

There is a probable death for Alice in Jan-Mar 1911.

Three of Edward's other children all married as Deeming.

There is a son, Edward James, baptized on 15th Jan 1899 but died in 1901. Thomas is a Busman of 29 Stafford Street.

David

Thanks David but you will find no records as my great grandfather was born Thomas Deeming but changed his name to Edward Arthur Secourable and later to Thomas Arthur Edward Getley none of which is in any records... marriage/census or otherwise.  He married Emily Beatrice Hallet in 1902 (Of the Halletts of Axmouth).  My grandfather was born in 1902 (Theodore Hothersall Getley) and his two brothers were born in 1899 and 1901 (Edward Arthur Hothersall Secourable and Thomas Alston Hothersall Getley) so I believe that this is a very different person to the one you mention


2
Warwickshire / Re: Frederick Deeming - Notorious murderer
« on: Thursday 29 March 12 02:07 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

I stumbled across this this morning after only just finding out recently that I am in fact descendant from the Deeming family.  My great grandfather changed his name to Thomas Edward Getley (Son of Mary Jane Getley).  My research points to Edward Deeming being the son of Thomas Deeming and Ann Bailey and the brother of Frederick Bailey Deeming.

From what I can gather from Mike Covell's very informative posts this is in fact incorrect....

If so can someone shed some light on this for me.  Obviously considering the events surrounding Frederick Bailey Deeming I can understand that many Deeming's information became purposely skewed.

Thanks in advance
Andrew

(I will write a couple more posts so that you can PM me if you wish)

Pages: [1]