1
The Common Room / Re: Ages on Indexes (Deaths)
« on: Tuesday 07 October 25 15:13 BST (UK) »
Thanks for all your of replies.
I remember now that the early indexes don't include ages. I suppose that I was hoping to get an adult rather than a baby! (Sometimes GRO gets it wrong).
The year in question is 1852.
Both sites accept Unknown instead of the Surname.
Melbell
I remember now that the early indexes don't include ages. I suppose that I was hoping to get an adult rather than a baby! (Sometimes GRO gets it wrong).
The year in question is 1852.
Both sites accept Unknown instead of the Surname.
Melbell


