1
Ayrshire / Re: Kilmarnock Kirk Session Records for 1863?
« on: Friday 17 January 14 07:46 GMT (UK) »
Hmmm, Ezekiel being Irish does sound sort of promising, but I can't see anyway that he could be related. Unless he was a brother-in-law of William. No relationship is given on the certificate however
I'm guessing that Ezekiel was probably just a good friend of the family which is why he registered the death. Though I would have thought if he was a good friend of William's that he and his wife may have taken in the younger Moffat girls to look after them in the absence of any other family, rather than having them live alone. Perhaps I am just looking at this with modern eyes though!
I've just had another thought - perhaps William remarried between Elizabeth's death sometime after the 1851 census and before he died in 1857. Perhaps he was "married", just not to Elizabeth. This would explain why there was no death record for an Elizabeth Moffat between 1857 and 1861.
So many possibilities, this really is so interesting!
Kirsty

I've just had another thought - perhaps William remarried between Elizabeth's death sometime after the 1851 census and before he died in 1857. Perhaps he was "married", just not to Elizabeth. This would explain why there was no death record for an Elizabeth Moffat between 1857 and 1861.
So many possibilities, this really is so interesting!
Kirsty
