Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - andrewp91

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 51
1
Dublin / Re: Patrick Andrew Walsh 1916.
« on: Sunday 31 August 25 20:03 BST (UK)  »
Quote from: andrewp91 on Sunday 31 August 25 18:39 BST (UK)
Mary Walsh in 1922. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1923/01134/1474465.pdf

I believe Mary Walsh mentioned above married a Joseph Walsh in 1941. This record can be found here. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1941/08829/5192739.pdf I believe this to be the case as again, Upper Gloucester Street is mentioned, but this time number 19 and number 27.

2
Dublin / Re: Patrick Andrew Walsh 1916.
« on: Sunday 31 August 25 19:07 BST (UK)  »
Quote from: LH on Sunday 31 August 25 18:43 BST (UK)
1901 Census shows a Patrick Walsh and family at the same address - 40 Marlboro Street.  I wonder if these are your Patrick’s parents.  See link:

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Dublin/North_Dock/Marlborough_Street/1329390/

Regards

That is a great find! I wonder if this is the grandfather/Mother of Patrick Andrew Walsh? I see that on the marriage record of Patrick and Esther the witness is a Annie Dolan. Could it be that Annie was the sister to Patrick, and she married a Dolan? .
My mistake, Annie could not be the sister of Patrick snr as she is the wife of the potential grandfather called Patrick.

3
Dublin / Re: Patrick Andrew Walsh 1916.
« on: Sunday 31 August 25 18:39 BST (UK)  »
Quote from: LH on Sunday 31 August 25 18:27 BST (UK)
Hi

Link to the 1913 marriage of Patrick Walsh of 27 Corporation Buildings and Esther Lawless:

https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/marriage_returns/marriages_1913/09882/5589695.pdf

Hi,

Thank you for that. I did see this link, however was not sure about the rules about posting links.

This is the Link to what I believe is his birth entry. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1916/01337/1551760.pdf

Thank you for informing me that it says Buildings. Is there much that I can use to find out what happened to the parents before or after this date?

From what I have found, It seems as though that Patrick Walsh and Esther had 3 other children.
(Baby) Walsh in 1918. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1918/01265/1524802.pdf
Joseph Walsh in 1921. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1921/01193/1496595.pdf
Mary Walsh in 1922. https://www.irishgenealogy.ie/files/civil/birth_returns/births_1923/01134/1474465.pdf

It seems as though Upper Gloucester Street is a primary location for this family, as it is the same address that is on the 1913 Marriage record of where Esther Lawless is said to be living. Is there much that I can do, to search for any records or information that may hold at this address or others to trace the ancestors?

4
Dublin / Patrick Andrew Walsh 1916.
« on: Sunday 31 August 25 18:06 BST (UK)  »
Hi,

Excuse me if there might already be a thread on this person, however I am looking to try and tackle a 2nd Great Grandfather; Patrick Andrew Walsh.

He was born on 14 August 1916 to Patrick Walsh and Esther Lawes. It seems as the address given was at 40 Malbons Street, Dublin?

He later went on to have children with Alice Leech. However I am unable to find a marriage record of this.

Having looked at the parents given, I have came to the conclusion that a marriage between Patrick Walsh and a Esther Lawless are the potential parents. This marriage took place on 28th March 1913. I am happy to stand corrected if someone believes otherwise though.

I am trying to obtain any information on them, or dating further back. I cannot make out the fathers  address on the 1913 marriage certificate between the said parents. It seems it is 27 Corporation Bridges?

Any help will be very gratefully appericated.

Kindest Regards
Andrew & Stephanie

5
Unwanted Certificates & Artefacts / Re: Annie Wilson
« on: Wednesday 29 March 23 12:26 BST (UK)  »
Thank you!

6
Unwanted Certificates & Artefacts / Annie Wilson
« on: Wednesday 29 March 23 01:13 BST (UK)  »
Upon clearing out some documents, I have found an original birth certificate for a Annie Wilson born 16 June? 1875 in Aston, Warwickshire.

I am not sure who this is if I’m honest or why it is our family’s possession. I have trace her to marry a Arthur Weldon and they had a child but that is all I’ve found so far. It has only been a brief look as it’s been mayhem here.

It would be a shame to throw it away, and if I’m honest I will keep it but do you think the Birmingham Archives would take it at all? It is extremely fragile, thin like pages within a bible.

If there is a descendant from this person I’ll happily send it out to you but you would need to prove to me how you are a descendant as I’m sure it’s valuable to someone.

If I don’t respond straight away, I apologise. I will do just need to be patient as I’ve a few things to sort out.

Kindest Regards
Andrew.

7
Yorkshire (East Riding & York) / Re: Thomas William Hunter
« on: Wednesday 29 March 23 00:04 BST (UK)  »
Another update:

I have now confirmed through DNA analyst who the mother of Thomas William Hunter is. I was able to trace Frank Hunter and find further evidence to support the theory I found.

Thank you all for the time taken to help push me in the right direction.

I’m going to give this a break for a bit in order to focus on some present events happening but if any future Thomas William Hunter descendants want the evidence I found feel free to ask and I will gladly share it with you.  :)

8
Yorkshire (East Riding & York) / Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
« on: Tuesday 28 March 23 23:13 BST (UK)  »
Considering I’ve had a few messages of support and concern from users saying my comment was fair in a challenging way and asking if everything is okay, I think I’m more than happy to keep my comments visible.

Who said you private messaged me? Who asked if you wanted to reply to you?
I see no correlation into what you are saying there...

You forgot to mention what you DID DO was you ‘added extra comments’ which were RUDE, argumentative and unhelpful. There was absolutely no reason for you to write that. It was 5 days from your post til your extra comments.
Your later comment where you state that I have no interest in my on family posts is extremely disgusting. You had absolute zero right to say that when you have no idea in what is going on in other peoples lives.

As I mentioned before, there is an awful lot more to deal with at the moment, none of it is your personal business, whilst I originally was going to share with you why, I then realised the way in writing you was using was very negative and distasteful. As mentioned, there are reason for why I had to put this on the back foot.

Had you added ‘extra comments’ that would have helpful in a respectful way you may have had a much better more considerate response. You cannot claim you are innocent in this. And neither can I (as I did not come back with questions or appreciation within the 5 days of you posting till now), however I was not the one to add silly comments about showing lack of interests.

I asked you politely once before to not respond to this as you clearly know how to play people and manipulate situations.

I have thanked you and and now I kindly request ONCE AGAIN to please not respond to this. It will be a form of harassment if you do as clearly you want to try and antagonise
Thank you.

Quote from: Neale1961 on Tuesday 28 March 23 23:00 BST (UK)
Andrewp91, Your rudeness / insulting reply is on display for all to see.
I did NOT contact you via private message. I did NOT ask for a reply, NOR did I ever request a reason for your lack of response.

9
Yorkshire (East Riding & York) / Re: Francis Hunter 1806-1876
« on: Tuesday 28 March 23 08:49 BST (UK)  »
Thank you to the person who sent a notification to me about this via private message.

To your original comments. Thank you for also finding the information that I had regarding a William and Sarah Thompson, not sure how you managed to select these two people as the being the definite people considering there does not seem to be a record showing Francis’s mother anywhere and with a name like William Hunter, I’m sure there probably been many families around at a similar time. (Hence the reason I was asking for some proof of the parents).

Thank you also finding the information I didn’t have (the burial), not sure where this is sourced or how you found it (the date) but you managed to find something I didn’t have. So genuinely, thank you for that.

Regarding your newer post understandably you might seem a little annoyed at not receiving a reply back, although petty, it doesn’t cost a lot to say ‘thank you’. However,.. you know what actually, I just wrote a whole thing about the reason why but then realised I don’t need to explain myself to anyone on why I failed to report back with questions or appreciations. The world does not revolve around Rootschat and things happen in peoples lives.

And as for your ‘I see no point in posting further information’ think it’s best for all if you don’t reply back with all due respect. But again thank you for the burial you did find.



Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 51