Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Allanfearn

Pages: [1] 2 3
1
Renfrewshire / Re: Death at sea - Greenock MI
« on: Sunday 10 June 12 17:10 BST (UK)  »
This may be very out of date, but there certainly was a marriage between Helen Baillie Inglis (born Inverness 16 July 1799, daughter of George Inglis and Helen Alves) and George Hepburn.   Details of the marriage settlement are, or should be, in the Inverness museum, among the papers of Helen's father, George Inglis, latterly of Kingsmills, a Demerara planter, and former partner in St Vincent of two of the Alves brothers from Inverness and the financier George Baillie).  I have also see a New Zealand posting suggesting it was a runaway marriage - she was certainly very young.   You probably have all this by now, but just in case......

2
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Monday 16 May 11 13:07 BST (UK)  »
There's a note above suggesting Elizabeth Bourchier was born in Herefordshire.   For what it's worth Rev Edward Bourchier, who seems to have been involved in some way with an estate at Evesham in Worcestershire, (see London Metropolitan Archives) was a vicar in Hertfordshire, or so it would seem.   Assuming the absence of a misprint in any of this, I wonder if whoever wrote Herefordshire actually meant Hertfordshire?    But the Worcestershire estate(nearer Herefordshire than Hertfordshire) suggests that they probably didn't.  However there  two Revs Edward Bourchiers in two succeeding generations as Rectors of Bramfield, Hertfordshire, and both seem to be well connected by marriage and ancestry - I found this on a website dedicated to identifying all the descendants of William the Conqueror!  I think you indicated where the wedding had taken place, but I'm blowed if I can find it just now.  Could you possibly remind me?

3
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Monday 16 May 11 09:03 BST (UK)  »
Not knowing anything about them, I thought the Bourchiers would turn out to be Huguenots.   Not a bit of it.   They have a huge English ancestry.   One of them married Oliver Cromwell.   I don't think I'll get past the Wikipedia pages on them for a bit.   But it might be possible to find out what Elizabeth's immediate kin were doing at the time of her marriage.

I think there's just a possibility I may have Alexander the saddler's father's date of birth, thanks to an online partial transcript of the Inverness register by Jane MacGillivray whose main interest is MacGillivray connections.    She has also done  work on the Petty register, also online.   IF it is the right John MacIntosh his father was a James, and brother to Mackintosh of Holm, a smallish Inverness landowner just to the south of the burgh proper, whose family certainly did have MacGillivray connections, and who were involved in burgh affairs over a number of generations (and also in the Darien settlement in Georgia at the end of the 1730s).    But it might be a little time before I can confirm (or not) any of that.   If it does turn out to be right there might be some difficulty explaining how the Clarks came to be connected.   Their mother was, I think, a Mackintosh, but my impression was that she was likely to have been of the Dalmigavie family.   But that bridge will have to be crossed when we come to it.

4
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 20:45 BST (UK)  »
Murphy's Law has struck.  The IGI family search throws up two possible marriage dates for Alexander the saddler's likely parents - 18 February 1727  in Petty and 9 March 1727 in Inverness.    There are also two baptisms of a Christian to them, 7 Sep 1736 and 16 Aug 1742.   But perhaps the IGI transcribers were not all that accurate.   I will have to check the facsimiles of the registers, which can be accessed in Inverness when I get back there.   Interesting if the Petty marriage is right, though as it probably would imply that Christian was from Petty.   I think it might be an idea to let it lie for a day or two - and give you a rest - but I'll come back to it sometime next week.   

5
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 17:05 BST (UK)  »
James MacIntosh son of John and Christian MacIntosh baptised Inverness in February 1735.   So at least one Alexander MacIntosh in Inverness had a brother James.   Perhaps this might be the right track.  I'll get the document a bit later on and send it.  If this is Rev James MacIntosh, he would have been ordained at 35, and been inducted to Papworth St Agnes, which was a very small parish, with, in the nineteenth century, a living worth around £400, at around 52.   

6
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 14:32 BST (UK)  »
Thinking again about Papworth St Agnes.     It may be that there is nothing to it, but a simpler explanation is always preferable.    The gentleman who is not the Trustee is the patron, still a minor.   James Mackintosh, after what looks like 17 years in Dominica, wanted to come back to Britain.    He has been ordained in East Anglia, so looking for a parish in that general area had seemed a good idea.   The Bishop of Ely would have had to be satisfied he was OK.   Perhaps Alexander Mackintosh acted as his agent and fixed all this, which under some head or other might have involved some sort of fee - possibly a "bung" - to the patron.  Which amounts to an allegation of simony, so I had better cover my back - call it "expenses".   This is still guesswork, of course, and it doesn't explain who James Mackintosh was, but he may well have been born around the late 1740s and I will have a look for him in Inverness.   It's not unusual for Invernessians to turn out to have been Episcopalians, though it's usually the local landowners rather than the merchants, in general, though if you scratch an eighteenth century Inverness merchant you generally find he has landowning kin, and if not kin, ambitions.

7
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 14:12 BST (UK)  »
I can't find any Inverness burgh marriage after 1750 which might be credible -there's an Alexander Mackintosh for whom Scotlandspeople claims there is no wife registered, but when you look at it, there is just a little cross, which might mean, I suppose, that no marriage took place, and he is described as being "in Essich" which is some way out.   Nor is there any Ewen in the baptismal registers, but I didn't try all the possible spellings of Ewen.   I will try again for marriages before 1750.

The document is very interesting in fact.   If you follow it back into the Cambridgeshire catalogue, it appears to relate to the appointment of a Rev James Mackintosh to the Cambridgeshire parish in question who had previously been a vicar in Dominica - unfortunately the way these postings work i don't seem to be able to refer back to it without losing my draft, so apologies for any errors.    I THINK it implies Alexander may have been present at his installation, but I may be mistaken.    My guess would be that the document of the 1780s might represent some sort of financial arrangement that Alexander Mackintosh might have backed, though whether he was making a loan on the security of the advowson to two crafty legal men ( or maybe one, since the underage one was probably the patron), or simply guaranteeing security I don't honestly know.  £950 is a fair chunk of credit.  But it may well be that James Mackintosh was a kinsman of Alexander's.   It looks a bit murky, but the twenty-first century has nothing to teach the eighteenth about squeezing every bit out of every possible asset.  I think, on the strength of the size of the amount in this reference and the Clarks' connection with Coutts, it might be well worth asking them whether Alexander had an account with them.   They do keep what they have.  The worst they can say is "No".

 I am honestly coming to believe that no-one at all in late eighteenth century Inverness was free of some sort of transatlantic connection to the slave economy.  The document's clearly worth following up but I don't know where to start looking for James Mackintosh.  The Bishop of London's papers in the Guildhall archives (or the London Metropolitan archives or Lambeth Palace) might have something about the Dominican end, but the London diocese, which ran the colonies, doesn't seem to have been very interested in ancestry per se, and you have to go along and search, since their online catalogues simply list the collections..   However, there's a wonderful grab-bag of Caribbean material called Caribbeana - a turn of the (twentieth century) genealogical periodical which used to be extremely rare, and has now appeared online from the University of Florida and doesn't hide behind a paywall.   I'll have a look and see if he turns up in Dominica, though it tends to be the bigger islands which crop up more frequently.

I don't have ( or can't find) here my note of the Golden Square address, except that it was in Sherrard Street.   The Cambridgeshire document has him in Haymarket so that puts it back before 1785.  I think the source might be one of the burgh documents and my notes on them are in Inverness.   Did St Martin's cover Golden Square, or might it have been St Anne's Soho?  Sometimes it's worth ringing up Westminster Local History library (if they haven't closed it and sold it off), or their archives.   They seem to have a fair spread of directories for late eighteenth and early nineteenth century London.

8
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 10:55 BST (UK)  »
Not that it really matters, but for the sake of completeness about Anderson, he is shown in 1805 in the Sun Insurance records (online catalogue National Archives) as insured at a multi-occupied address in Great Portland Street.   Easy walk from the Haymarket.

9
London and Middlesex / Re: St. Martin in the Fields, Westminster
« on: Sunday 15 May 11 10:21 BST (UK)  »
Anderson's will confirms (but you have to go through extra-elaborate trust provisions providing for his wife, who seems to have been a Cathcart, and written in broad pen Gothic script first) his Inverness links - there's a legacy to a widow (maiden name I think had been Denoon) of the minister of Moy, which is more or less the territory of the Mackintosh himself.

Pages: [1] 2 3