1
Sussex Lookup Requests / Re: Baptism Lookup, please
« on: Tuesday 15 February 11 22:12 GMT (UK) »
KGarrad, thank you kindly for your time and effort re my lookup request.
Regards,
Wozza.
Regards,
Wozza.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
Sussex Lookup Requests / Baptism Lookup, please
« on: Tuesday 15 February 11 04:14 GMT (UK) »
Children of Charles Henry Isted & Mary ( Polly ) Champion, number 7 in total. The 1st. 3
Charles Henry, George William and Mary were all Bap. in St. Peter Church, Ashburnham,
1880, 1884 and 1886, however I cannot find an entry for the latter 4 children, namely,
James b.1889, Frederick John b. 1893, Kate b. 1896 and Alfred Thomas b. 1900.
Source; Online OPC, Baptisms, Ashburnham, Sussex.
Forever greatful should someone be able to help out with this request.
Regards,
Wozza
Charles Henry, George William and Mary were all Bap. in St. Peter Church, Ashburnham,
1880, 1884 and 1886, however I cannot find an entry for the latter 4 children, namely,
James b.1889, Frederick John b. 1893, Kate b. 1896 and Alfred Thomas b. 1900.
Source; Online OPC, Baptisms, Ashburnham, Sussex.
Forever greatful should someone be able to help out with this request.
Regards,
Wozza
3
Sussex / Re: Isted's of East Sussex
« on: Sunday 13 February 11 06:05 GMT (UK) »
G'day Janan, I'm in a bit of a pickle at the moment. It has been quite a few weeks since
our last contact concerning the American contact you gave me details for, and sadly whilst
I still have her address, I have mislaid Her name somewhere. I am stiil awaiting a reply to
the message that I sent to her ( aknowledgement of receipt of email ). From time to time I
get emails from people that I have no idea who they are ( scam type ) , and as a result I delete them straight away. One of them may have been the one I was awaiting, but I did
not recognise the name, and the subject line did not reflect my inquiry.
Would it be too much trouble to ask you to resend the name and address again please Jan ?
Regards,
Wozza.
our last contact concerning the American contact you gave me details for, and sadly whilst
I still have her address, I have mislaid Her name somewhere. I am stiil awaiting a reply to
the message that I sent to her ( aknowledgement of receipt of email ). From time to time I
get emails from people that I have no idea who they are ( scam type ) , and as a result I delete them straight away. One of them may have been the one I was awaiting, but I did
not recognise the name, and the subject line did not reflect my inquiry.
Would it be too much trouble to ask you to resend the name and address again please Jan ?
Regards,
Wozza.
4
Sussex Lookup Requests / Re: James Isted & wife Mary x 2 Who's who?
« on: Thursday 20 January 11 10:53 GMT (UK) »
G'day again Jan. No, James, Mary and John were all chr. in East Grinstead.
If you don't mind I'll list the family Members ( confirmed ) that I have to date.
They are, George, son of James & Mary, Thomas James 1859, Charles Henry 1861, sons of
George & Mary ( nee Morley ). George William 1883, Harry 1887, Tom 1889, Fred 1893,
Charlie 1897. All Reg. at Battle, except Charlie, ( Reg. Steyning ) Sons of Thomas James
and Catherine ( nee Turner ). Elsie M, 1912, George F,1916, Dorothy B, 1920 children of
George William & Edith Susan ( nee Saunders ). Charles Henry,1880, died 1906, George
William,1884, Mary, 1886, James, 1889, Frederick John,1893, Kate, 1896, Alfred Thomas,
1900, children of Charles Henry & Mary ( Polly) ( nee Champion ). George William, b1884
married Katherine Murphy in 1909 and came out to Australia in 1910, followed in 1912, by
his brothers James, Fred' John & Alfred Thomas. In 1921 their parents Charles Henry and
Mary came out as well. The rest of the afforementioned remained in Sussex.
Surprisingly, there are other Isted families out here that are non related.
Anyway, you can see what I meant about the naming pattern.
Best wishes, Jan.
Wozza
If you don't mind I'll list the family Members ( confirmed ) that I have to date.
They are, George, son of James & Mary, Thomas James 1859, Charles Henry 1861, sons of
George & Mary ( nee Morley ). George William 1883, Harry 1887, Tom 1889, Fred 1893,
Charlie 1897. All Reg. at Battle, except Charlie, ( Reg. Steyning ) Sons of Thomas James
and Catherine ( nee Turner ). Elsie M, 1912, George F,1916, Dorothy B, 1920 children of
George William & Edith Susan ( nee Saunders ). Charles Henry,1880, died 1906, George
William,1884, Mary, 1886, James, 1889, Frederick John,1893, Kate, 1896, Alfred Thomas,
1900, children of Charles Henry & Mary ( Polly) ( nee Champion ). George William, b1884
married Katherine Murphy in 1909 and came out to Australia in 1910, followed in 1912, by
his brothers James, Fred' John & Alfred Thomas. In 1921 their parents Charles Henry and
Mary came out as well. The rest of the afforementioned remained in Sussex.
Surprisingly, there are other Isted families out here that are non related.
Anyway, you can see what I meant about the naming pattern.
Best wishes, Jan.
Wozza
5
Sussex Lookup Requests / Re: James Isted & wife Mary x 2 Who's who?
« on: Thursday 20 January 11 02:33 GMT (UK) »
You have obviously put in some time & effort with this Jan, So thank you very much for the same 
.
This morning after receiving your reply, I did two things: one was to go into the old LDS
igi search field and downloaded 23 James Isted's chr.data from 1770 - 1806. The only
helpful one was for James chr. 25 Feb. 1780. East Grintead. Secondly, I did a Google search for Isted Sussex. In all of those links, there was one called " Weald " which is the family tree that this James is shown. Since he is one of the James involved, I thought, what a great way to eliminate some of the children. Sadly
There are only three Shown in his line, Sarah 1803, William 1808 And Frances 1830. ( what a massive jump ) all were
chr. in East Grinstead. There was also a Sarah chr. in 1810 ( LDS igi ) I wonder if she is
another line or, replacing the earlier Sarah who may have died infant?
To me it seems that there are children missing, though I may well be quite wrong.
Now back to the now 22 James Isted's, which I have narrowed down to five.
There were five chr. in Horsted Keynes: Sophia 1813, Harriet 1816, Hannah 1819,
William 1825, and John 1828.
( Mary Istead, born 29 Jan.1829
( Mary Istead, chr. 09 Feb. 1829 West Hoathly
( Ann Istead, born 06 June 1810 West Hoathly
( Ann chr. 29 July 1810
Edward Isted, chr. 28 April 1822 West Hoathly
Mary Isted, chr. 1840 Worth
Elizabeth, chr. 1848 Worth
This last group I believe could be in my wifes line
James Isted chr. 06 Oct.1806
Mary chr. 11 April 1813
George chr. 04 June 1815 the earliest proven ancestor
John chr. 25 Oct. 1818
When I look at my wifes line of descent, there is no comparison with all of the others,
( namewise ).
Looks like I have a cold case on my hands Jan.
Best wishes,
Wozza
.This morning after receiving your reply, I did two things: one was to go into the old LDS
igi search field and downloaded 23 James Isted's chr.data from 1770 - 1806. The only
helpful one was for James chr. 25 Feb. 1780. East Grintead. Secondly, I did a Google search for Isted Sussex. In all of those links, there was one called " Weald " which is the family tree that this James is shown. Since he is one of the James involved, I thought, what a great way to eliminate some of the children. Sadly
There are only three Shown in his line, Sarah 1803, William 1808 And Frances 1830. ( what a massive jump ) all werechr. in East Grinstead. There was also a Sarah chr. in 1810 ( LDS igi ) I wonder if she is
another line or, replacing the earlier Sarah who may have died infant?
To me it seems that there are children missing, though I may well be quite wrong.
Now back to the now 22 James Isted's, which I have narrowed down to five.
There were five chr. in Horsted Keynes: Sophia 1813, Harriet 1816, Hannah 1819,
William 1825, and John 1828.
( Mary Istead, born 29 Jan.1829
( Mary Istead, chr. 09 Feb. 1829 West Hoathly
( Ann Istead, born 06 June 1810 West Hoathly
( Ann chr. 29 July 1810
Edward Isted, chr. 28 April 1822 West Hoathly
Mary Isted, chr. 1840 Worth
Elizabeth, chr. 1848 Worth
This last group I believe could be in my wifes line
James Isted chr. 06 Oct.1806
Mary chr. 11 April 1813
George chr. 04 June 1815 the earliest proven ancestor
John chr. 25 Oct. 1818
When I look at my wifes line of descent, there is no comparison with all of the others,
( namewise ).
Looks like I have a cold case on my hands Jan.
Best wishes,
Wozza
6
Sussex Lookup Requests / Re: Isted/remiss
« on: Tuesday 18 January 11 22:33 GMT (UK) »
Many thank's for the responses Chatters. I really messed up with this posting.
Regards,
Wozza
Regards,
Wozza
7
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Mary Isted
« on: Tuesday 18 January 11 21:46 GMT (UK) »
Thank's for the tip CaroleW.
Wozza
Wozza
8
Sussex Lookup Requests / Isted / remiss / burials
« on: Tuesday 18 January 11 02:39 GMT (UK) »
G'day to all you Chatterbugs who have been so supportive in my Isted quest. I have
an awful feeling that I may have missed replying to some of you, sooooo! please accept
my heartfelt gratitude for your help.
I am at a bit of a loose end at the moment, not too sure of which way to go.
Burials
are something that I have been looking at, but having no success. So far I have only
found George Isted who was buried 22 November 1883, in the churchyard of St.Peter,
Parish church of Ashburnham. His wife Mary ( nee Morley ) died in 1890 aged 73 yrs. but I can't find a record for her. 
Some other family members died 1945, 1948 etc. I
need to know if it is possible to track them in that time frame.
A little while ago I posted this message, but somehow in my confused mind it seems
that I was in the wrong place. Hopefully I'll get it right this time.
Best wishes
Wozza
an awful feeling that I may have missed replying to some of you, sooooo! please accept
my heartfelt gratitude for your help.
I am at a bit of a loose end at the moment, not too sure of which way to go.
Burialsare something that I have been looking at, but having no success. So far I have only
found George Isted who was buried 22 November 1883, in the churchyard of St.Peter,
Parish church of Ashburnham.
His wife Mary ( nee Morley ) died in 1890 aged 73 yrs. but I can't find a record for her. Some other family members died 1945, 1948 etc. I need to know if it is possible to track them in that time frame.
A little while ago I posted this message, but somehow in my confused mind it seems
that I was in the wrong place. Hopefully I'll get it right this time.
Best wishes
Wozza
9
Family History Beginners Board / Re: Mary Isted
« on: Tuesday 18 January 11 01:55 GMT (UK) »
My apologies if I'm on the wrong posting CaroleW. Now I'm really confused.
Regards ,Wozza
Regards ,Wozza