Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lesley_A

Pages: [1] 2
1
Hi Chatters,

I would love to have some help with dating this family photo, which I believe to be of a member of my HARRIS family, from Hugglescote Leicestershire.

The original is slightly less than 6in by 4in, and is glued to a glossy white card, just a little larger. No photographer's name is visible, on either the front or the back of the cardboard mount, which simply has the name Emma written on it.

The children are also dressed in sailor suits, which I know were common for several decades. However, I would guess the date to be after 1878, which is when my great-grandfather Elijah HARRIS began writing again to his family in Hugglescote, Leics, after a gap of more than 20 years.

(He had migrated to Australia in 1855, and needed to do some catching up, as did his English relatives).

Many thanks,


Lesley
(In Nundle, NSW, Australia)



 



 

2
London and Middlesex / Re: My elusive convict Frederick HENRY b. 1809
« on: Tuesday 14 February 12 12:04 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Alyssa,

Funny, that you have come up with exactly the same results, *including*the Marriage Cert that I bought and scanned in for another researcher on 18 January last  ;D

You have just made one small error - it was the Marquis of *Lorne* Hotel (not the Marquis of Lorn).

But I guess that is microscopic, in the scale of things - where we have Fred as both a convict and *not* a convict at the same time ... indeed, a policeman and a good pal of Thomas COOK, J.P., who attended his wedding at the Dungog Court House.

Ah, call me old fashioned ... but I happen to believe that research should be more than just cobbling together *any* bits of paper with the words Frederick HENRY written on them. Things like engaging your necktop computer in the proceedings - and at least acknowledging the sources of particular items of research, so that you don't make the oops! of announcing it back to the source as something you yourself have found.

(And, presumably, paid for)  ;D

Cheers,


Lesley




3
Leicestershire / Re: William HARRIS, Mary DEAKIN/DEACON m Ibstock 1794
« on: Monday 24 October 11 08:06 BST (UK)  »
Hi Willsy,

Well, Sarah HARRIS chr. Hugglescote 10 Aug 1794 supposedly married Thomas MOORE at Thornton, 24 Nov 1819 ... but I am puzzled about why, if she was married, she was buried at Hugglescote under her maiden name (on  25 Mar 1866).

The age given (71) tallies exactly, presuming she was born between 26 Mar 1794 and 10 Aug ... which seems likely, as her parents had just married on 30 Jan 1794.

Interested in any comments about this - the chances that a married woman would have been buried under her maiden name, back in her home town ... or, alternatively, whether it could have been a *different* Sarah HARRIS who married Thomas MOORE.

BTW, Sarah MOORE appears in the 1861 Census as the mother-in-law of Joseph HARRIS, and her age checks out with her being the Sarah HARRIS from Hugglescote.

But the burial puzzle remains - unless, of course, the Sarah HARRIS buried in Hugglescote is a Mrs Sarah HARRIS, of the same age as my Sarah  :-\

Cheers,


Lesley
(In Nundle, NSW - still sunny)

4
Leicestershire / Re: William HARRIS, Mary DEAKIN/DEACON m Ibstock 1794
« on: Friday 21 October 11 03:04 BST (UK)  »
Hi Victor,

Well, no surprises as far as John HARRIS is concerned ... but is *did* set the cat among the pigeons, for his sister Sarah.

Because that surely means that she died a spinster ... and therefore is *not* the Sarah HARRIS who m. Thomas MOORE at Thornton, Leics, on 24 Nov 1819 (and subsequently had four children with him).

That one had been tracked right down to the 1861 Census, with Sarah visiting Joseph HARRIS and Elizabeth MOORE as Joseph's mother-in-law ... wrong, wrong!

But I had at the back of my mind that Sarah remained a spinster - must check my pre-Internet scribbles for that  :D

Many thanks, for that act of genie kindness  :)

Cheers,


Lesley
(In sunny Nundle, NSW)

5
London and Middlesex / Re: My elusive convict Frederick HENRY b. 1809
« on: Monday 21 March 11 22:47 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Chatters,

Well, the Newgate Prison Register PCOM 2/201 has now been searched - and here is the result:

***
Frederick Henry
20
5/7 fairbrohaz Stouth.
St. Martins
Labourer
***

A photo of the record is being sent to me - but apparently, that means 5 ft 7 in, fair complexion, brown hair and hazel eyes, stoutish.

Nothing new there - but a *Labourer* (when his Convict Indent says Actor, Hatter (3 years) and Clerk.

St. Martins is probably St. Martins in the Fields - and there is no Frederick HENRY baptized there, in or around the right date. So, some more sleuthing needed ... was he Frederick someone else, and his mother remarried? Or, so I need to sift through *all* the males baptized in that parish at about the right time, looking for one who has disappeared.

(Not married, not buried, not found in the 1841 Census).

So, progress of a sort - but the puzzle continues  :)

Cheers,


Lesley

6
London and Middlesex / Re: My elusive convict Frederick HENRY b. 1809
« on: Saturday 12 February 11 05:01 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Alicia,


Cecilia Jane m James HYDE 1st, James BLAKE 2nd (moree peop.)


I wonder, is this marriage actually right? I have Cecilia married 1st to James HYDE, but 2nd to William KNOX in Tamworth (in 1900).

(A descendant of that marriage, Bruce KNOX, has published some articles about Fred).

Also, I think her name was just Cecilia, not Cecilia Jane ... has there been a mix-up here, I wonder?

Cheers,


Lesley

7
London and Middlesex / Re: My elusive convict Frederick HENRY b. 1809
« on: Friday 11 February 11 22:07 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Alicia,

Definitely the right family - I have your Martin MORGAN in my tree as born in Nundle, NSW (pop. 300), which is where I now live  :)

The Elizabeth HENRY you refer to is a daughter, not a sister. I am once again in a cloud of Doubt over Fred and his origins, with the *only* source of information being, as far as I know, the data on his NSW Death Certificate.

(The informant being my great-grandfather, his son-on-law, John ALBERTSON).

If you have *anything* else about Fred, I would love to have it. Much of what was written about him is (unfortunately) garbage, written by the family in the days when a convict past was something to be covered up, rather than flaunted. <sigh>

Lesley

8
Leicestershire / William HARRIS, Mary DEAKIN/DEACON m Ibstock 1794
« on: Saturday 06 November 10 02:10 GMT (UK)  »
Hi Chatters,

I am once again trying to trace my 3G-grandfather William HARRIS, who married Mary DEACON/DEAKIN at Ibstock, 30 Jan 1794.

They definitely had three children:

Sarah chr Hugglescote 10 Aug 1794
John chr Hugglescore 17 Jan 1796
Thomas chr Hugglescote 25 Mar 1798

There may have been others - I suspect that this is the William HARRIS who became a member of the Hugglescote General Baptist church in 1799.

Help, anyone? He *may* also have been the William HARRIS buried at Whitwick St John's  25 Sept 1834 (age 77), but have not been able to confirm this.

John HARRIS is listed in the 1851 Census as a Coal Pit Back Lab, and his son Elijah was also a coal miner, before migrating to Australia in 1855.

Cheers,


Lesley

9
London and Middlesex / Re: My elusive convict Frederick HENRY b. 1809
« on: Wednesday 27 October 10 09:37 BST (UK)  »
Hi Teddles,

I would believe that about the violin ... the comment I read says "A Strad according to the label in it" (and I doubt that genuine ones - of which there were apparently *two* in Australia - came with a stick-on label)  :)

Cheers,


Lesley

Pages: [1] 2