1
Armed Forces / Re: 32nd Regiment of Foot 1815
« on: Thursday 02 September 10 23:35 BST (UK) »
I am getting some answers now
Such as
32nd Ft
Capt David Davie's Co:
Pte Smith McDole
Capt Charles Hawe's Co.
Pte James Dumheath
Capt Charles Wallett's Co.
Pte Danl Dumheath. (as Alec states above)
McDole appears rightly so, having been wounded at Quatre Bras.
The surname is so close it certainly appears clerical error. If Daniel Dumheath is Nathaniel Dunsheath,his brother/relative James is also on the NA Archive. A calculated guess here is that Daniel and James are brothers, or at least related.
But now check this WO 97 out for Nathaniel Dunsheath:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... ssmethod=0
then, the brother/relative James:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... ssmethod=0
Now, using the above records, which goes someway to show that Nathaniel & James are both from Antrim, and probably related. This appears to prove what Alec states is that Nathaniel is in fact Daniel on the printed Waterloo roll..
To increase the family tree, maybe Hugh is related too: Who qualified for an MGS clasp Java and appears on the MGS Roll with the 69th.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... image1.y=0
Such as
32nd Ft
Capt David Davie's Co:
Pte Smith McDole
Capt Charles Hawe's Co.
Pte James Dumheath
Capt Charles Wallett's Co.
Pte Danl Dumheath. (as Alec states above)
McDole appears rightly so, having been wounded at Quatre Bras.
The surname is so close it certainly appears clerical error. If Daniel Dumheath is Nathaniel Dunsheath,his brother/relative James is also on the NA Archive. A calculated guess here is that Daniel and James are brothers, or at least related.
But now check this WO 97 out for Nathaniel Dunsheath:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... ssmethod=0
then, the brother/relative James:
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... ssmethod=0
Now, using the above records, which goes someway to show that Nathaniel & James are both from Antrim, and probably related. This appears to prove what Alec states is that Nathaniel is in fact Daniel on the printed Waterloo roll..
To increase the family tree, maybe Hugh is related too: Who qualified for an MGS clasp Java and appears on the MGS Roll with the 69th.
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/cata ... image1.y=0