1
The Lighter Side / Re: Old telephone numbers (UK)
« on: Sunday 07 July 13 19:20 BST (UK) »
Thanks, everyone, for the speedy replies.
One of the great attractions, for me, of genealogy is that you learn so many other interesting things on the side!
I should have realized that in 1908 you still had to call the operator and state the number you wanted. Just about everybody with low telephone numbers (all of them businesses -- they were clearly the "early adopters") had a party line in the village I'm researching. I've read since that there was a system of distinct rings so that you did at least know whether an incoming call on your shared line was for you or not. Another thing was that, at the rural exchanges in 1908, there were operators on duty only from around 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on most days (and only 8 to 10 a.m. on Sundays!).
One of the great attractions, for me, of genealogy is that you learn so many other interesting things on the side!
I should have realized that in 1908 you still had to call the operator and state the number you wanted. Just about everybody with low telephone numbers (all of them businesses -- they were clearly the "early adopters") had a party line in the village I'm researching. I've read since that there was a system of distinct rings so that you did at least know whether an incoming call on your shared line was for you or not. Another thing was that, at the rural exchanges in 1908, there were operators on duty only from around 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. on most days (and only 8 to 10 a.m. on Sundays!).