Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - misuaorang

Pages: [1] 2
1
Thanks! Lots to look at there - I've started some searching, hope to find something though of course have to keep expectations modest as this wasn't exactly a crucial naval action. The tone of those news reports is sadly amusing in retrospect - things were absolutely going pear-shaped but they present everything in such a positive light.

2
World War Two / US submarines based out of Australia operating in Indonesian waters
« on: Tuesday 12 August 25 03:03 BST (UK)  »
I'm trying to follow up a story my late father-in-law told me. He was Indonesian (Javanese), conscripted by the occupying Japanese and at one point assigned to crew a rice cargo boat. In the Bali Strait (ie strait between Java and Bali) he and fellow crew members spotted an American submarine approaching them. The submarine was submerging but just enough of it was out of the water that it collided with their boat, cutting it in half and sinking it. My father-in-law clung to some wreckage and eventually washed ashore on the Java side of the strait. He thought the rest of the crew drowned.

What I would like to do is identify which submarine this was and what it was doing. The US Navy have helpfully allowed war patrol logs to be published online (https://maritime.org/doc/subreports.php), I guess more succinct than the real ship logs but perhaps easier to publish without worrying about classification. That shows that many US submarines operated first out of Brisbane, on the east coast, and then from Fremantle and Exmouth on the west coast of Australia, heading north to do mischief among Japanese shipping, as well as miscellaneous other tasks like landing commandoes and evacuations. They would have had to pass through the various straits through Indonesia - ie Lombok Strait (between Bali and Lombok), Sunda Strait (Java and Sumatra) or further east past Timor or Papua. You can go via the Bali Strait, however that wouldn’t be preferred for submarines because it’s quite shallow. I’ve taken the ferry across that strait a couple of times, the water does not look deep at all, I rather fancy if a submarine had been in the vicinity at the time I may well have spotted it. So not ideal submarine passage waters - but certainly possible if you had some good reason to go that way.

My father-in-law said the submarine was American, however I do wonder how well he could identify it under the circumstances. There was a small number of Dutch and Australian submarines also operating in a similar way to the American submarines. Unfortunately I can no longer ask him.

Does anyone have any suggestions at all for how I could make more progress on this? I know it’s not an easy case :-), but any clue no matter how small would be appreciated!

3
Northamptonshire / Re: Septimus Bland in jail in 1851
« on: Thursday 03 December 20 17:39 GMT (UK)  »
Oh, brain misfire on my part - I saw Northumbria when you wrote Northamptonshire! The Septimus's certainly did get around, and into trouble.

4
Northamptonshire / Re: Septimus Bland in jail in 1851
« on: Wednesday 02 December 20 16:40 GMT (UK)  »
A bit late to be replying, but anyway... I can't answer why Septimus was in jail in 1851, but I did come across an account on Ancestry about an affray in 1877 that has an interesting connection. Together with my great-(n)-uncle Anthony Jacques, one Septimus Bland assaulted a police sergeant and several others at Quarry Street, in front of Jowsey's beerhouse, Shildon. I don't have a paid membership to Ancestry, and probably can't provide a link to it that would work, and I think it a bad idea to just copy and paste the whole thing here in deference to the no-doubt crack team of lawyers Ancestry employs, but hopefully I've given enough info that you could find it yourself if you do have access to Ancestry.

On the 1881 Census I note that a Septimus Bland (born 1812) and another (born 1857, year before my relative Anthony Jacques) were living together in Whitworth, which is also in the same area. I speculate that Septimus the elder is the one you're looking for, while the younger is the one getting into trouble in 1877. Presumably having legal problems ran in the family (or was a consequence of poverty etc).

5
The Common Room / Re: JustKia's Scavenger Hunt...Everyone Welcome To Join In
« on: Thursday 01 July 10 16:22 BST (UK)  »
JustKia is this you?

http://boards.ancestry.co.uk/surnames.wimbush/42.1/mb.ashx

and this?

http://boards.ancestry.co.uk/surnames.wimbush/42/mb.ashx

That's actually me  :D. That's how I learned a little about the descendants of Samuel, son of the Samuel who is the quarry of this hunt. I descend from Betty, daughter of Samuel.

6
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Can You Find Martin?
« on: Saturday 26 June 10 16:52 BST (UK)  »
I'll look forward to the Scavenger Hunt, thanks, JustKia.

Moston, if you were interested in more info about Betty Wimbush 1849, Patrick Connaughton and descendants I can certainly provide quite a lot for many (but not all) branches, just let me know. I was just in Canada the other day, could have had a look for some Davies's if I'd known  :).

Tim

7
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Can You Find Martin?
« on: Monday 10 May 10 18:05 BST (UK)  »
Hi Moston, good to make your acquaintance. Looks like we're cousins, albeit somewhat distant. Betty (Mary's younger sister) is my great great grandmother.

Since you haven't made your three-post quota yet you can't PM, unless I'm mistaken, so feel free to ask more questions here. How much do you know about Mary's family? Her father Samuel was a pork butcher, born in Wolverhampton as best I can find out - spent his professional butchering years at Black Lion Court, Long Millgate, Manchester. From what I've read, there were pig enclosures out in the street all along Long Millgate at that time, so presumably he just had to walk out his front door to procure his livestock. He died in 1859 of heart problems (at least that's the result of my attempt to decipher the terminology used on his death cert, I don't have it in front of me and don't recall the precise terms used), which is of course the only way a good pork butcher should go.

JustKia has identified Samuel's wife Betty (aka Betsy aka Elizabeth) Knight above.

I'd be interested in hearing about William and Mary's family - I haven't looked very hard to learn much there, on the assumption that looking for Davies's is going to be hard work as it's a common name (unlike Wimbush). Betty's husband Patrick Connaughton moved to Salford/Manchester from Wrexham, Wales, so when I see the name Davies I immediately wonder whether there is some other connection there, but I don't know any details.

Tim

8
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Can You Find Martin?
« on: Wednesday 21 April 10 06:13 BST (UK)  »
I've now checked. Betty's marriage cert (from the church, not the GRO - I inherited the original) from her wedding of 21 Nov 1880 says she resides at 27 Great Ducie St, Manchester.

The 1881 census says that Martin Knight resides at 27 Great Ducie St, Manchester. Looks to me like the case is well enough proven, in case anyone had any doubt that Martin Wimbush and Martin Knight were one and the same person.

What I called a "short-form" birth cert for Betty actually really just looks like an acknowledgement of registration - ie I guess that when her parents registered the birth, they got that to prove that they had performed their legal duty to register.

Witnesses at the wedding were John Connaughton and Alice Davies - presumably the latter was Betty's niece, Mary's daughter.

Tim

9
Lancashire Lookup Requests / Re: Can You Find Martin?
« on: Wednesday 21 April 10 04:39 BST (UK)  »
I've arrived late to this thread! I can add one minor snippet of information that slightly strengthens the picture you've put together, which is that on the marriage cert of Betty Wimbush and Patrick Connaughton, about 1880, Betty's address is given as Gt Ducie St. I don't have the details in front of me, which probably means I should keep it to myself until I do, as my memory is far from infallible, but I won't :-) - I'll check when I get home and post any correction necessary.

In the 1871 census (RG10-4048) Betty is living with her sister Mary and brother-in-law William Davies. So it wouldn't be a surprise if at a later date she was living with a different sibling.

Just thought I should point out the obvious possibility, since no doubt it's occurred to people, but hasn't been stated anywhere yet that I can see, that Martin may actually have been Samuel's son, but because the birth occurred before the marriage he used his mother's maiden name. Of course it may not be possible to prove this one way or the other. I've read elsewhere that there may have been some legal obligation to use one's mother's maiden name in the case of an illegitimate birth, even after the parents marry, though I've no idea how reliable that retrospective legal opinion is.

If you get Samuel jnr's birth cert, I'd also be keen to know the details, if you don't mind. I've inherited a "short form" birth cert for Betty, which has hardly any interesting detail on it. Guess I should order the proper one.

Wonder how Martin came to change profession from butcher to baker - guess he made pork pies :). Never a candlestick-maker, though, apparently...

I hope someone can dig up a marriage record for Samuel snr and Betty snr.

Tim

Pages: [1] 2