Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ScallyW

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 12
1
Travelling People / Re: Hoskins/Hoskings family? West part of Britain.
« on: Wednesday 10 April 13 19:28 BST (UK)  »
Scally w, would be really interested to know where the documents about my ggg uncle Reuben smith's church were that you read, could you please tell me?

I don't remember seeing any official documents as such, just accounts written by people reporting that there was a church there at some point.

I've had a search to see if I can find the original reference I found for it and I came up with this text posted on a gypsy research site, although I can't say that this is where I first saw it or not as it was a long time ago.

THE GYPSIES CHURCH ON HARTLEBURY COMMON, WORCESTERSHIRE

Built of wood with arched leaded windows and a tiny cross on one of the gables, the Gypsies on Hartlebury Common would be summoned to church by a small bell that hung on a nearby tree.
Hartlebury Common had long been a regular stopping place and before the church was built, Gypsy Reuben Smith erected a mission tent there. Around 1910, the Gypsies were evicted from the common, among them John Loveridge, who then bought some land, and with his son-in-law Will Webb, decided to fund the building of a permanent church.
For 17 years it was well supported, sometimes by a congregation of up to seventy Gypsies.
In 1927 the Vicar of Stourport decided to close the church while the Travellers were away and although when approached he said it would be re-opened when the Gypsies returned from hop-picking, it was an empty promise.
The Gypsy church remained closed and eventually became the home of John Loveridge’s daughter.

-------------------------

I suspect, but cannot say for sure, that this quote may have come from Romany Routes - Volume 7 No 4 - Sep 2005, if that's any help at all.

Regards
ScallyW.

2
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Friday 16 November 12 14:40 GMT (UK)  »
Well, I suppose we do have to take into account of the various accents spoken around the UK at the time and of the ability of the enumerators to correctly transcribe what they thought they heard... I have an ancestor in my own tree whose name was Methuselah but he was transcribed once as Matthew Sellah.

I've had a poke about for Hawkins in the Wiltshire area and haven't come up with any sign of another Bina with the name Hawkins other than the one Carol found in 1981.   What is surprising, to me at least, is that there are quite a few Binas for other surnames.... I think it must be a common shortening of Sabina/Sebina although I did find a Rhowbina birth register as well.  There are some records of one Bina Stone (nee Tibbolds) who was occasionally shown as Abinah/Sabina.  It must be a common shortening in Wiltshire and that's how it passed down to my Rose Bina.

Edited to add:

There is a 1851 record for an Abinah Tibbolds (1842, Wroughton, Wilts) with sister, Honos (1835, Wroughton, Wilts) and I would think the sister's name is Honor - which is a name found a couple of times as descendants of Job & Betty/Elizabeth Hawkins with one of their daughters named as such.  The wife of these children is listed as having been born in Gloucestershire while the father is also Wroughton.  Maybe one of them is connected to Job's wife and both Bina and Honor are names that come down through their family.

I know not to take too much notice of user-loaded trees out there but you can pick up some clues to be investigated further.  On one such tree there was a claim (with precise dates!) of the marriage of Job Hawkins to his wife but on looking at the Pallots Index record attached the wife's name was Ann Giddings, not Betty/Elizabeth Giddings.  Yes, she could have had two names but only used one for the marriage but I don't really consider it enough proof.  However, what was interesting in looking into the Giddings surname is that there are two baptism records for someone called Giddings of the appropriate age to be the wife of Job Hawkins.

Elizabeth Giddings, bp 10/4/1805, Urchfont, Wilts.  Father: Mark  Mother: Elizabeth.

Betty Giddings, bp 22/2/1806, Urchfont, Wilts.  Mother: Honor Giddings.


And lastly....


There is a Sabina Hawkins (b. 1866, Wilcot, Wilts) listed in 1881, Wilcot, Wilts., living with grandmother Elizabeth Hawkins (b. 1803, Urchfont, Wilts), which is the same village listed for the wife of Job Hawkins f/o William Hawkins.  Not sure yet who she is the daughter of but it's an indication that the name Sabina had been used in the family prior to the birth of Rose Bina in 1888.  Yes, I know I've just shown that there were two females born in Urchfont in the same era with basically the same name but the chances of both of them marrying a Hawkins is remote.... and there is a Pewsey death reg for a Job Hawkins in 1874 (aged 68) so William's supposed mother would have been a widow by then.

All very fascinating and just a tad frustrating...


3
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 17:25 GMT (UK)  »
Maybe an ancestor was a Sabina, got shortened to Bina, and passed on?

Could be.... now that I have a lead on Job Hawkins in Wilts, I can look into that...

Thanks to everyone who contributed to this thread, I'm always amazed at how lucky I am to find people willing to put in the time and effort to help solve these mysteries - and in one afternoon, no less!!!

Regards
ScallyW.

4
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 17:15 GMT (UK)  »
But without sight of her birth cert you don't know her mothers maiden name?

Yes, I meant get two birth certs...  sorry I didn't make that clear.


There's a birth of a Rose Bina Hawkins in Southwark in Dec 1901.

There's a baptism of the same child in Southwark on 25th Nov 1901 (DOB 7th Nov) to a single mum Alice Ann Hawkins.

Alice was the only sister I never found a marriage for.

Yes, I saw that....  it does make one wonder why they all went about naming their daughters after who we suppose to be their sister ...?  For one to do so is fairly normal I should think, for two to do it makes me curious...was it some kind of 'in honour/rememberance of' situation.  And I'm really curious as to where the name Bina comes from in the first place!

Actually, I think I now have to wonder if 'my' Rose Bina was the one born in 1888 or the one in 1901.... no scrub that, her death certificate as Rose Bina Marsh gives her precise DOB.

5
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 16:51 GMT (UK)  »
Do let us know when the birth cert arrives with MAry's maiden name ....

The final proof would actually be the birth certificate of one of the 'siblings' showing the mother's maiden name...

As Rose Bina is your interest then surely it shoudl be her birth cert that you obtain?

Yes, of course, but proof that she shared the same mothers maiden name would be the icing on the cake and irrefutable proof that it is one and the same family.

6
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 16:44 GMT (UK)  »
To complete the family marriages..

Arthur Albert Hawkins married Ellen Bertha Byron at St Anne's Lambeth on 25th Dec 1909.

Arthur 24 a bachelor (can't read his job,possibly a paviour?) of 50 Blockhouse Street,Canterbury Road,Old Kent Road, father William Hawkins labourer.

Ellen 23 spinster of 3 Pleasant Place,Vauxhall,father Charles Byron labourer.

Witnesses Joseph and Edith (Waller?)



Now that is quite interesting.  The daughter of one of Mary Jane's cousins married a man called Waller.  Not that particular forename but I haven't fully researched that branch yet.....

7
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 16:40 GMT (UK)  »
Do let us know when the birth cert arrives with MAry's maiden name ....

The final proof would actually be the birth certificate of one of the 'siblings' showing the mother's maiden name...

8
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 16:39 GMT (UK)  »
You say that Rose didn't marry till 1950's but she lived with him for years.............what was his name?

His name was William John Marsh and the story was that they had to wait for his first wife to die for them to marry.  Recent discoveries show us that although they waited about 35 years, they didn't quite wait long enough because his first wife was MIA but happily married elsewhere!  We don't know if a divorce was obtained or not although William Marsh listed himself as a widower in 1911.

9
London and Middlesex / Re: Rose Bina Hawkins b. 1888 Battersea/Wandsworth.
« on: Thursday 15 November 12 16:24 GMT (UK)  »
Personally I think we've cracked it and that my Rosé Bina was telling fibbies about being an only child.

Not quite sure what to make of Louisa's brother's name being given as her husband but the names were put in after the sheet was filled out so who the hell knows what was going on!

Thanks to everyone for their help on this.  I'm going to pencil this lot in and see where it leads....

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 12