RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => England => Oxfordshire => Topic started by: LizzieL on Wednesday 11 June 25 09:07 BST (UK)

Title: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Wednesday 11 June 25 09:07 BST (UK)
Thomas Peck married Rose Eltham on 31 July 1893 at Oxford, St Thomas.
In the 1901 census, they are living at 5, Godfrey Yard St Ebbes. They have four children
Thomas 7
Wm John 5
Gertrude A 10months
William 4

I have found the following:
Birth registration for a Thomas Bertie Peck Q4 1894 but with mothers maiden name Smith and a baptism in Oxford of a Thomas Bertie Beck with parents Thomas and Rose (record says born on 8 Sept 1894).
Birth Registration for William Peck (no middle name) Q1 1896, and a baptism parents Thomas and Rose born 19 Feb 1896. Se he's OK
Nothing for William John
Birth reg for Gertrude Alice Q2 1900 and baptism giving date of birth as 20 May 1900.
Can anyone find anything for William John? Odd they would have two sons called William, unless they listed a dead child on their census form.

Moving on to 1911, Thomas, Rose and family are living at 58 High Street, St Thomas Oxford
They have had 9 children, of whom 5 are still living
With them on census day are
Gertrude  11
Burtie  9
Florrence 7
Solomon 5
William  11 months

I have found birth regs for Bertie, Florence and Solomon, but nothing for William (b 1910)

Counting up the children, only Gertrude from the 1901 has survived, so assume the other 3 have died. So apart from no other records of William John, who is the 9th child who must have been born (presumably sometime after Thomas and Rose's marriage) and who has died before census day 1911?

Please can anyone sort out this family?



Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: emeltom on Wednesday 11 June 25 10:21 BST (UK)
GRO Ref

William Peck Jun 1910 Hewington 3a 1097 mmn Elton

The image of the original gives the Registration District as Headington, and I'm guessing that Elton should read Eltham.

There is also a Death reference for a William Peck Jun 1911 Oxford 3a 530 age 1

This may or may not be the same William. You would need to get the certificate to be certain.
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: emeltom on Wednesday 11 June 25 10:41 BST (UK)
If the William born Mar 1896 Oxford 3a 862 mmn Eltham was born 19 February 1896 then he is living at 74 Lytton Road, Oxford in 1939 and dies at that address 12 February 1968

William Peck Mar 1968 Oxford 6b 1374 age 71
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Wednesday 11 June 25 12:38 BST (UK)
GRO Ref

William Peck Jun 1910 Hewington 3a 1097 mmn Elton

The image of the original gives the Registration District as Headington, and I'm guessing that Elton should read Eltham.

There is also a Death reference for a William Peck Jun 1911 Oxford 3a 530 age 1

This may or may not be the same William. You would need to get the certificate to be certain.

Thank you, that looks like William's (1910) birth registration. Elton is one of the many variants of Eltham. That is likely to be his death. I have found his burial record on 1st June 1911. Address is 58 High street.

But as he is listed on the census, he won't be one of the four children who died before census day (2nd April).
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Wednesday 11 June 25 13:15 BST (UK)
If the William born Mar 1896 Oxford 3a 862 mmn Eltham was born 19 February 1896 then he is living at 74 Lytton Road, Oxford in 1939 and dies at that address 12 February 1968

William Peck Mar 1968 Oxford 6b 1374 age 71

The dob of 19 Feb 1896 was on the baptism record, so if he is on the 1939 register, he can't have died pre- 1911. But that means Thomas and Rose had two Williams at the same time.
This is getting more confusing.
Unless they misunderstood the question on the 1911 census and thought it meant the number of children then living with them, of which there were 5 listed on the census form.
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Wednesday 11 June 25 15:11 BST (UK)
I think I've found Gertrude Peck in 1921, a boarder with William Harding and his wife Alice. Age a bit out, but Rose Eltham had a younger sister called Alice who married a William Harding. And also in the household is a "Mrs Alatham mother" a 75 year old widow b Abingdon.
Another variant of Eltham to add to the list of 42 I already have  ;D. 

Bertie (1902) got done on three counts of stealing and spent 1921 census night in Feltham Borstal. Also found his marriage and death.
Solomon's in a Reformatory in Northamptonshire, haven't found what he did yet, but it says both parents alive on the record, so they should be around in 1921, but not found them yet.
Still haven't found Thomas Bertie (1894) after his birth / baptism.

There's a baptism for a Frederick John s/o Thomas and Rose Peck, birth 1 Jan 1898, no birth reg but there is a George John Peck reg Q1 1898 Oxford mmn Alton (variant # 14) which could be the same person, if the parents had forgotten what they had decided to call him. 
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: Mabel Bagshawe on Wednesday 11 June 25 21:40 BST (UK)
Isn't Thomas Bertie the same as Thomas who's on 1901?

There's a Thomas the right age b Oxford in Northampton Society's Reformatory for Boys, Tiffield, Towcester  in 1911
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: amondg on Thursday 12 June 25 04:55 BST (UK)
I believe they misunderstood the question in 1911.

I can put together 8 children

Thomas Bertie born 8 September 1894  (St Thomas ( Peacock Yard)
William  born 19 February 1896             (St Thomas  9 Peacock yard) 
Frederick John born 1 January 1898     - St Ebbe  5 Twinings? Yard - Dies 1980 as                             Frederick George Peck same DOB.
Birth reg as George John 1898 mmn Alton

Gertrude Alice  reg 1900 ADDED born 20 May 1900 bap St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Berty reg 1902       ---- 24 March 1902- 1957 Rose Hill Cemetery -son of Thomas and Rose
Florence reg. 1904 - ADDED born 1 April 1904, St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Solomon John  reg. 1906  born/bap Solomon Jack  4 October 1906 - 5 Godfrey's Yard
William   bap 16 May 1911 --  buried 1 June 1911 of 58 High Street
Should he be one month and not 11 months in 1911???

Based on a child every 2 years there is one missing 1908.

They go on to have
Emily Matilda  born 13 February 1912  - 58 High Street ADDED buried 20 October 1913 age 20 months  - 58 High Street. St Thomas
Harry  reg. 1915
 
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Thursday 12 June 25 07:46 BST (UK)
Isn't Thomas Bertie the same as Thomas who's on 1901?

There's a Thomas the right age b Oxford in Northampton Society's Reformatory for Boys, Tiffield, Towcester  in 1911

Thank you, sounds like him. That institution seems to become the Peck family's Alma Mater, it;s the same one Solomon was in later
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: LizzieL on Thursday 12 June 25 07:51 BST (UK)
I believe they misunderstood the question in 1911.

I can put together 8 children

Thomas Bertie born 8 September 1894  (St Thomas ( Peacock Yard)
William  born 19 February 1896             (St Thomas  9 Peacock yard) 
Frederick John born 1 January 1898     - St Ebbe  5 Twinings? Yard - Dies 1980 as                             Frederick George Peck same DOB.
Birth reg as George John 1898 mmn Alton

Gertrude Alice  reg 1900 ADDED born 20 May 1900 bap St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Berty reg 1902       ---- 24 March 1902- 1957 Rose Hill Cemetery -son of Thomas and Rose
Florence reg. 1904 - ADDED born 1 April 1904, St Ebbe - 5 Godfrey's Yard
Solomon John  reg. 1906  born/bap Solomon Jack  4 October 1906 - 5 Godfrey's Yard
William   bap 16 May 1911 --  buried 1 June 1911 of 58 High Street
Should he be one month and not 11 months in 1911???

Based on a child every 2 years there is one missing 1908.

They go on to have
Emily Matilda  born 13 February 1912  - 58 High Street ADDED buried 20 October 1913 age 20 months  - 58 High Street. St Thomas
Harry  reg. 1915

Thanks. That's the same set that I've got. The Frederick / George/ John child was probably the Wm John in 1901 census.
Although a gap in children about 1908, I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't a 9th child and it was just a case of their inability to count.
Title: Re: Children of Thomas and Rose Peck
Post by: Mabel Bagshawe on Thursday 12 June 25 21:10 BST (UK)
Unless there was a stillbirth, or birth and death in very short succession which they didn't bother to register

But they included in the total in 1911