RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Lancashire => England => Lancashire Lookup Requests => Topic started by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 15:48 BST (UK)

Title: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 15:48 BST (UK)
Can anyone help me find Ethel Featherstone on the 1911 Census?

She was born 23/12/1874 Ethel Roberts and married George Featherstone in Salford in 1896.

I believe they only had 1 daughter, Lucy Featherstone.

1881 - Manchester with Grandparents
1891 - Manchester with Grandfather
1901 - Salford with husband George & daughter Lucy
1911 - ?
1921 - Domestic Servant in Rawtenstall, Lancashire
1939 - Pensioners Widow in Blackpool

Many thanks,

Francesca.
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Milliepede on Sunday 01 June 25 15:53 BST (UK)
Was George still alive in 1911?  and have you found Lucy in 1911?
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Milliepede on Sunday 01 June 25 15:58 BST (UK)
There is a Lucy 14 with an Alice not Ethel 34 both born Manchester in Wales in 1911 - both visitors to the Welch household  :-\

Do you think that might be them?  Alice is down as a widow and a mantle maker millinery

Possible death for George age 28 in 1902
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 15:58 BST (UK)

Obituary for George Featherstone 1902

The Guardian
London, Greater London, England
Tue, 21 Oct 1902
Page 12

https://www.newspapers.com/article/the-guardian/173604876/

Mother Caroline passed May 1902

Manchester Evening News
Manchester, Greater Manchester, England 
Thu, 29 May 1902
Page 2

https://www.newspapers.com/article/manchester-evening-news/173606973/


Sandra
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 16:24 BST (UK)
There is a Lucy 14 with an Alice not Ethel 34 both born Manchester in Wales in 1911 - both visitors to the Welch household  :-\

Do you think that might be them?  Alice is down as a widow and a mantle maker millinery

Possible death for George age 28 in 1902

I saw the 1911 for Lucy Featherstone with Alice Featherstone, but I assumed it wasn't her as I didn't recognise the 'Alice Featherstone', but I suppose she could have been a sibling of her Father perhaps, I'll have to research her to find out.
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 17:13 BST (UK)
I'm confused by this actually, on the 1901 Census record Ethel and George Featherstone are living with their 4 year old daughter 'Lucy', however Lucy Featherstone (who was definitely Ethel's daughter) was born 16th October 1886, so she was in fact 14 years old.

I cannot find a birth for Lucy Featherstone in 1886.

I'm suspecting that she was not the daughter of George Featherstone.

Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: rosie99 on Sunday 01 June 25 17:37 BST (UK)
George and Ethel did not marry until March qtr 1896.

FEATHERSTONE, LUCY       mmn ROBERTS 
GRO Reference: 1896  D Quarter in MANCHESTER  Volume 08D  Page 269
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 18:29 BST (UK)

England, Select Births and Christenings, 1538-1975

Lucy Featherstone Birth Date   16 Oct 1896
Baptism Date   22 Nov 1896 - Baptism Place   Manchester, Lancashire, England
Father    George Featherstone - Mother    Ethel Featherstone.

Sandra

Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 18:31 BST (UK)

Did Lucy marry Francis Nolan in 1926 Manchester North - 8d 1134  ?


Lucy Nolan  - 1897 - 1957  (aged 60 years)
Registration District   Salford Lancashire
Volume   10f Page   494

FIND A GRAVE

Lucy Nolan 1897 - 1957


Lytham Park Cemetery and Crematorium
Lytham Saint Annes, Fylde Borough, Lancashire, England
Plot Grv B22aR

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/81921488/lucy-nolan

Francis Edward Nolan

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/81921487/francis-edward-nolan

Sandra
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 19:22 BST (UK)
IF the above is correct - at a quick glance, this is what it seems to look like.........

Thomas Featherstone 1828 - 1895 and Hannah Johnson 1828 - 1884 - Lincolnshire - had William Featherstone 1850 who married Caroline Goulding (passed 1902)  George Featherstone born 1874 was a son who married Ethel Roberts - 1894. 
George and Ethel had a daughter Lucy - Lucy married Francis Edward Nolan in 1926

Thomas and Hannah also had a son Tom Henry Featherstone in 1874 - Thomas married Lydia Crooks in 1894 Sheffield.
This is the Lydia Featherstone who is on the 1939 register with Ethel Featherstone (widow) and Lydia Featherstone Nolan.

George Featherstone born 1859 son of Thomas and Hannah married Fanny Hurton 14 August 1881 West Gorton. St Mark, Lancashire

I believe this could be George

Deaths Jun 1918 
Featherstone    George    59    Bolton    8c   501

This could be Fanny passed in 1925

Fanny Featherstone - 1860 - 1925  (aged 65 years)
Registration Quarter   Apr-May-Jun
Registration District   Carlisle   Cumberland
Volume   10b Page   61

FIND A GRAVE

Tonge Cemetery
Bolton, Metropolitan Borough of Bolton, Greater Manchester.

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/228565423/fanny-featherstone

George passed  1918

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/161391116/george-featherstone

Sandra
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Mabel Bagshawe on Sunday 01 June 25 19:31 BST (UK)
I'm confused by this actually, on the 1901 Census record Ethel and George Featherstone are living with their 4 year old daughter 'Lucy', however Lucy Featherstone (who was definitely Ethel's daughter) was born 16th October 1886, so she was in fact 14 years old.

I cannot find a birth for Lucy Featherstone in 1886.

I'm suspecting that she was not the daughter of George Featherstone.


Given Ethel was b c1874, are you really suggesting she had a child in 1886, when she'd be around 12 yrs old?

Th e1896 date seems much better
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 19:33 BST (UK)
Obituary for Tom Henry Featherstone

Manchester Evening News
Manchester, Greater Manchester, England 
Sat, 8 Jan 1938
Page 9

https://www.newspapers.com/article/manchester-evening-news/173618468/

Lydia Crooks/Featherstone passed 1955
Lydia Featherstone - 1869 - 1955 (aged 86 years)
Registration District   Heywood Lancashire
Volume   10c Page   561

All the infants of Tom Henry Featherstone and Lydia died in infancy.
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: MollyC on Sunday 01 June 25 20:10 BST (UK)
Sheffield Indexers has recorded the burial for Tom Henry at City Road Cemetery, grave no. 10096, section Z.  Then, selecting "Find Similar in Same Grave" returns Lydia plus four infant Featherstones, also a Mary Elizabeth Whittle d1947 a65.  Is she connected? Or a possible indexing error.
http://www.sheffieldindexers.com/
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: *Sandra* on Sunday 01 June 25 20:19 BST (UK)

So far I listed 4 infants - Ada, Eve, Henry and Lily

Ada Featherstone - Ada Featherstone Ada Featherstone - 1896  - 1900 (aged 4 years)
Death Registration Place   Sheffield, Yorkshire West Riding, United Kingdom
Yorkshire West Riding,
Volume   9c  Page   408

Eva Featherstone 1899 - 1900  (aged 1 years)

Death Registration Place   Sheffield, Yorkshire West Riding, United Kingdom
Death Date   Jun 1900 Yorkshire West Riding, United Kingdom
Volume   9c Page   329

Henry Featherstone  1901 - 1901 - Age   0
Sheffield, Yorkshire West Riding
Death Date   Mar 1901
 Death Place   Yorkshire West Riding
Volume   9c Page   326

Lily Featherstone - 1901 - 1901   - Age   0
Death Registration Place   Sheffield, Yorkshire West Riding
Yorkshire West Riding, United Kingdom
Volume   9c Page   334


Sandra



Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 21:41 BST (UK)

Did Lucy marry Francis Nolan in 1926 Manchester North - 8d 1134  ?


Lucy Nolan  - 1897 - 1957  (aged 60 years)
Registration District   Salford Lancashire
Volume   10f Page   494

FIND A GRAVE

Lucy Nolan 1897 - 1957


Lytham Park Cemetery and Crematorium
Lytham Saint Annes, Fylde Borough, Lancashire, England
Plot Grv B22aR

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/81921488/lucy-nolan

Francis Edward Nolan

https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/81921487/francis-edward-nolan

Sandra

Yes, Lucy did marry Francis Nolan, I'm in contact with their daughter who's just turned 94. She has very little knowledge about her parents.

There were whispers in the family that George Featherstone's death was suspicious, I see from the article that he suffered 'a brief illness'.

From what has been posted (thank you very much for your help) the pub at Eccles Road was also where my Great Grandmother worked and is listed on the 1901 census as 'Nellie Holan' which is a mistranscribed 'Nolan'. William Featherstone is the head at the time.

Lucy Nolan is listed on the 1939 register as having been born in 1886. With her being born in 1896 this means she was 20 years younger than her husband Frank, born 1876 (which is news to their daughter, she didn't realise the gap was so large).
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Mabel Bagshawe on Sunday 01 June 25 21:58 BST (UK)
If you look very carefully at the image, there appears to be a very feint "96" and some more notation written above 1886 as if to correct her dob. They also have the son's year of birth wrong by 2 years, later corrected.

Someone knew her correct dob given the death registration has it correct
Title: Re: Lookup Request 1911 Census Ethel Featherstone
Post by: Chezney on Sunday 01 June 25 22:10 BST (UK)
If you look very carefully at the image, there appears to be a very feint "96" and some more notation written above 1886 as if to correct her dob. They also have the son's year of birth wrong by 2 years, later corrected.

Someone knew her correct dob given the death registration has it correct

Ah yes, I see that now. I have it printed in black and white and it looks so faint, but now you’ve pointed it out I can see.