RootsChat.Com
General => Armed Forces => World War One => Topic started by: Michellemagee on Monday 06 January 25 20:38 GMT (UK)
-
Both of these have the same date of death same service number but different names. ?
Copyright image removed
-
2nd
-
??
Your image shows two men with different service numbers.
-
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission have the soldier with Service Number 1681 as Thomas Magee. Medals were also issued to a Thomas Magee who had that Service Number.
Both the 1891 and 1901 Censuses have a Sarah Magee living in Manchester with sons Thomas born 1886 and Bartholomew born 1889. I cannot find any information re Bartholomew having enlisted although I'm sure he probably did, nor can I find a death or a Census entry after 1901.
-
It looks like Bartholomew enlisted using his brother's name for some reason.
Thomas survived until 1964 per this tree https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/200948583/person/252633761993/facts
-
It looks like Bartholomew enlisted using his brother's name for some reason.
How do you know he used his brothers name.
Thomas survived until 1964 per this tree https://www.ancestry.co.uk/family-tree/person/tree/200948583/person/252633761993/facts
-
The Commonwealth War Graves Commission have the soldier with Service Number 1681 as Thomas Magee. Medals were also issued to a Thomas Magee who had that Service Number.
Both the 1891 and 1901 Censuses have a Sarah Magee living in Manchester with sons Thomas born 1886 and Bartholomew born 1889. I cannot find any information re Bartholomew having enlisted although I'm sure he probably did, nor can I find a death or a Census entry after 1901.
That’s what I get.
So I know Thomas is alive till the 60s
It’s got to be Bart.
-
His service number 1681 gives an attestation date of early-mid 1910.
The 1/Mancs. were in India at the time hence no appearance on the 1911 census.
-
How do you know he used his brothers name.
It's a logical deduction. All the army records are in the name of Thomas but the family announcement tells us it was actually Bartholomew.
-
The other Thomas Magee (352971) from the above tree was in the 2/9th. Mancs.
Make of it what you will.
-
You asked:
How do you know he used his brothers name.
On his war gratuity entry he's named as Thomas Magee with a list of legatees
including his brother also Thomas.
-
How do you know he used his brothers name.
It's a logical deduction. All the army records are in the name of Thomas but the family announcement tells us it was actually Bartholomew.