RootsChat.Com

Family History Documents and Artefacts => FH Documents and Artefacts => Topic started by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 10:26 GMT (UK)

Title: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 10:26 GMT (UK)
I have the earrings in the photo, which I think belonged to my g-g-grandmother - seen in other photo around 1915.

The earrings look like entwined initials, E and M, which don’t fit with anyone obvious in the family.

I wondered if anyone knows about earrings from Victorian/Edwardian era - are these typical? Might they be second hand, so initials are not relevant? The family were not well off at all so I can’t imagine her ever affording personalised jewellery.

Any thoughts or general information would be appreciated.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 10:36 GMT (UK)
The earrings
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: jaywit on Sunday 29 December 24 11:19 GMT (UK)
Do they have any marks on the back?
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 11:28 GMT (UK)
No, no marks on back at all
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Gadget on Sunday 29 December 24 11:34 GMT (UK)
I've tried to straighten it so that the letter(s) are clearer. It does seem to show an M but the pattern is very strange   :-\
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 11:41 GMT (UK)
Back of earring. Sorry don’t know how to make pics smaller.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Gadget on Sunday 29 December 24 12:02 GMT (UK)
Back reduced in size

Looking at the front again, it could be a W rather than an E.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Gadget on Sunday 29 December 24 12:24 GMT (UK)
Is there a three petal (?) form above the M. This seems to line up with the vertical piece that goes down the middle and seems to end in a type of root shape.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: jaywit on Sunday 29 December 24 12:27 GMT (UK)
There doesn't appear to be any marks on the back.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 12:48 GMT (UK)
The central straight part could be interpreted as a separate part, possibly giving a letter I as well as the M and E or W.

The lady’s grandparents had initials W and M - William and Maria - but they were still not well off - he was a bricklayer, and their children were charwoman/servants.
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 12:55 GMT (UK)
Trying to get a better photo
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 13:02 GMT (UK)
Just google searched the photo and found several examples of same image for sale on Et*y. Screen shot attached (hope that’s not breaking rules). Wonder what its significance was?
Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kateharding on Sunday 29 December 24 13:26 GMT (UK)
Think I’ve found it! They were called puzzle brooches/earrings, sometimes the lady’s name, but also often A, E, I, representing amity, eternity, infinity. Seems like they were popular in later 1800s, often unmarked silver. The lady who owned these was born in 1865 so that would fit.