RootsChat.Com
Old Photographs, Recognition, Handwriting Deciphering => Handwriting Deciphering & Recognition => Topic started by: junepeter327 on Tuesday 09 April 24 21:23 BST (UK)
-
This is unusual, the husband George - does not have any occupation listed but the wife Martha does, they are listed on the end of the page. It may be related to weaving.
All I can now see is - Stone Bares - which makes no sense whatsoever.
Anyone else have any suggestions - I think the S may be an I
-
Stone barer, maybe? http://doot.spub.co.uk/code.php?value=072 ( note the “r” in what I assume is weaver above)
Don’t know why only the wife has an occupation though
-
In all probability it’s an Enumerators error. Mistakenly put it on the wrong line
-
I would agree with Carole, enumerator likely wrote in wrong place. It seems an unlikely job for a female.
see Barer on link
http://www.worldthroughthelens.com/family-history/old-occupations.php
Cas
-
Stone Barer makes sense, there is a Stone Getter on the previous sheet of the census.
A Stone Barer removed the top soil to expose the stone, then a Stone Getter mined the stone.
So a man's job - agree written on wrong line.
Tony