RootsChat.Com

England (Counties as in 1851-1901) => Lancashire => England => Lancashire Lookup Offers => Topic started by: ODP on Sunday 31 December 23 21:30 GMT (UK)

Title: Mary Prickett
Post by: ODP on Sunday 31 December 23 21:30 GMT (UK)
Looking for any info on Mary Prickett who married Joseph Bamber who was a coachman at Holy Trinity church Liverpool 1831. We think she was originally from Lancs but have no infomation re-family or siblings or her address in Liverpool.
Can anyone help please.
Cheers ODP
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: heywood on Sunday 31 December 23 21:49 GMT (UK)
1851 2182 /440/30
Shows her born Liverpool. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:SGLQ-8HN
Mary is 42 yrs born abt 1809

In 1841 560/8/8 there is also a son, John
Mary is 25 yrs born about 1816
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: amondg on Sunday 31 December 23 22:08 GMT (UK)
Ancestry

EDITED
John bap 28 November 1832 St Peter Liverpool -Roscoe Lane

Mary Ann bap 2 October 1846 St Peter - Rothbone Street
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: crisane on Sunday 31 December 23 22:22 GMT (UK)
Ancestry

EDITED
John bap 28 November 1832 St Peter Liverpool -Roscoe Lane

Mary Ann bap 2 October 1846 St Peter - Rothbone Street

That is a long break between children.
This birth reg shows Mary as the mother of Mary Ann
Mary Ann Bamber mmn Prickett
GRO Reference 1846  December 1/4 registration district Liverpool  Vol 20  Page 547

I can't see any other births 1839 to 1846 with a surname Prickett or similar.

This is another thread about this family
https://www.rootschat.com/forum/index.php?topic=879125.0;topicseen
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: amondg on Sunday 31 December 23 22:39 GMT (UK)
Have you checked the witnesses at the marriage John Wallworth and Thomas Beattley.

Are they connected family somehow?

-------------------
1841 and 1851 they are lodgers with other families. I expect they could have travelled as he was a coachman, however I agree there aren't anymore births reported in other parts of the country.   
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: heywood on Sunday 31 December 23 23:10 GMT (UK)
I don’t think the Peter Bamber on the other thread is from the Bamber/Prickett family.
I will post my reasons on that thread to keep this re Prickett.
However, if Peter is the relevant person, then Mary Prickett may be irrelevant.
Title: Re: Mary Prickett
Post by: ODP on Monday 01 January 24 01:44 GMT (UK)
Hi all. Thanks for the info. No connection as far as we can tell with witnesses to marriage However Crisanes post with  john and mary Anne bamber dates  and the church rings true. 
 Thanks all