RootsChat.Com

General => The Common Room => Topic started by: Pennant on Friday 01 December 23 11:04 GMT (UK)

Title: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Pennant on Friday 01 December 23 11:04 GMT (UK)
I was browsing (transcripts of) some baptism records from the 1690s/1700s, and I came across someone whose occupation was "wild beast". Was there such an occupation, or was it a description of his mental state/criminal activities?
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Gadget on Friday 01 December 23 11:12 GMT (UK)
I would think that it was a bad transcription. Have you got a link to the original?

Gadget
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: fiddlerslass on Friday 01 December 23 11:12 GMT (UK)
Perhaps it was a descendant of this chap or similar :)

https://firespringsfolktales.wordpress.com/2013/05/20/the-wildman-of-orford-2/
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: PaulineJ on Friday 01 December 23 11:13 GMT (UK)
I think the clue is in the TRANSCRIBED part of your question.

No judgement should be made without viewing the original ( or a copy thereof)
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Gadget on Friday 01 December 23 11:16 GMT (UK)
 Further to my Reply #1, could you give details of the the entry so we might be able to access the original?
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Pennant on Friday 01 December 23 11:27 GMT (UK)
Thank you all for the amazingly quick replies.
No, I haven't got access to the originals, just the transcriptions. It's on the Llandyrnog (Denbighshire) baptism register, 18th June 1704 Ann Jones d John Wild Beast.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: manukarik on Friday 01 December 23 11:39 GMT (UK)
Is it this?

https://search.findmypast.co.uk/record?id=GBPRS%2FWAL%2F4631157%2F00119&parentid=GBPRS%2FB%2F879138464%2F1

And a mistranscription from Latin?
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Gadget on Friday 01 December 23 11:45 GMT (UK)
I think this is the entry
 
No ref to wild beast!

(snap - I was reducing the size!)
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: JenB on Friday 01 December 23 11:48 GMT (UK)
The occupation appears to be 'bestiarii' , which is presumably where the 'wild beast' transcription has originated  :-\
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Pennant on Friday 01 December 23 11:52 GMT (UK)
Thank you very much. It looks like the right one (given that William Piers son of William is the one underneath in the transcription). But my Latin is very sparse. "decimo" in Spanish means tenth, so I'm guessing it might have come from the same word. Is the next word "octavo" - eighth? But basically I've no idea.

Added: what does bestiarii mean?
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Gillg on Friday 01 December 23 12:15 GMT (UK)
 Bestiarii was the name given by the ancient Romans to those fighting wild beasts.   They were usually criminals, who were to be executed in this way.  But it was also a term used to describe the people who looked after the animals or the gladiators who specialised in fighting wild animals, so maybe he was an animal trainer!   
http://www.tribunesandtriumphs.org/gladiators/bestiarii.htm
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Watson on Friday 01 December 23 12:24 GMT (UK)
I think in this context it would be someone who kept a herd of animals.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: JenB on Friday 01 December 23 12:25 GMT (UK)
Looking again at the writing on the original, I don't think its 'bestiarii' I think it might be 'vestiarii' which would probably translate loosely as someone who made or dealt in clothes.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Watson on Friday 01 December 23 12:52 GMT (UK)
Yes, I agree vestiarii   It can mean a keeper of a vestry in an ecclesiastical sense.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: arthurk on Friday 01 December 23 13:35 GMT (UK)
Another vote for vestiarii. I suspect he was just a run of the mill tailor - a keeper of ecclesiastical vestments seems more appropriate to a large cathedral than a small place like Llandyrnog.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Watson on Friday 01 December 23 15:32 GMT (UK)
Yes, I agree vestiarii in this context is not likely to have its ecclesiastical meaning.
Title: Re: Strange Occupation?
Post by: Pennant on Friday 01 December 23 18:08 GMT (UK)
Thank you all very much for your helpful comments. It didn’t occur to me that they would have “transcribed” a translation (or mistranslation).